▲ 642 ▼ new growth forest rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone) submitted 2 years ago by glizzyguzzler@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] glizzyguzzler@lemmy.blahaj.zone [S] 8 points 2 years ago is clearly definitely not a beaver is clearly not trying to determine where to avoid shitty soft woods permalink fedilink source parent