▲ 52 ▼ Can hair be straightened permanently? (lemm.ee) submitted 3 years ago* by handsatinizer@lemm.ee to c/nostupidquestions@lemmy.world 23 comments fedilink hide all child comments Or maybe for a long time? Googling doesn't help
[+] WarmSoda@lemm.ee -5 points 3 years ago* (3 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [+] J12@lemmy.world 24 points 3 years ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ZenGrammy@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) Lemmy's version of NSQ also prohibits replies that are mean or mocking the OP. We encourage asking any question that doesn't break the rules. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] J12@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee -4 points 3 years ago None of that changes my point. I was simply adding to the previous comment. permalink fedilink source parent [–] kava@lemmy.world 5 points 3 years ago* (1 child) it's better to get a summary from a human instead of having to sort through a bunch of SEO-spam sites where you have to wonder if what you're reading is secretly an ad or written by some guy who knows nothing about the topic pumping out 20 of these 500-word articles a day for $100 a day. it's one of the reasons I think both chatGPT & Kagi are better for "searching" stuff than Google. At least for certain things. I hate those SEO sites. I used to write for them when I was a teen in high school to make beer money. These days I'd imagine a lot of them are just gonna be written by AI going forward You know those sites. Kagi calls them listicles. "10 reasons why you should straighten your hair" "8 top things to keep in mind" etc etc permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) All of that comes down to exactly what I said. The inability to read search results. I do agree that "ai" articles are horrible. And they'll probably get better at what they do, unfortunately. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kava@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago I think it's not as much an inability but an unwillingness. Although I concede some people are better at using search engines than others. Anybody who had to learn programming online for example is probably better than average. permalink fedilink source parent [–] butterypowered@feddit.uk 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) My kids still ask me stuff that they should be capable of searching for themselves. I mean, it’s nice to still be needed, but they’re mid-teens now and if search engines are too much effort then good luck surviving in the real world. 😂 (Kids, if you’re reading this many years in the future, I do love you, I promise. 😘😄) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ninjakitty7@kbin.social 2 points 3 years ago To be fair, the search engines of today have lost the war against SEO garbage. 10 years ago google actually gave answers. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] J12@lemmy.world 24 points 3 years ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ZenGrammy@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) Lemmy's version of NSQ also prohibits replies that are mean or mocking the OP. We encourage asking any question that doesn't break the rules. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] J12@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee -4 points 3 years ago None of that changes my point. I was simply adding to the previous comment. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ZenGrammy@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) Lemmy's version of NSQ also prohibits replies that are mean or mocking the OP. We encourage asking any question that doesn't break the rules. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] J12@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee -4 points 3 years ago None of that changes my point. I was simply adding to the previous comment. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kava@lemmy.world 5 points 3 years ago* (1 child) it's better to get a summary from a human instead of having to sort through a bunch of SEO-spam sites where you have to wonder if what you're reading is secretly an ad or written by some guy who knows nothing about the topic pumping out 20 of these 500-word articles a day for $100 a day. it's one of the reasons I think both chatGPT & Kagi are better for "searching" stuff than Google. At least for certain things. I hate those SEO sites. I used to write for them when I was a teen in high school to make beer money. These days I'd imagine a lot of them are just gonna be written by AI going forward You know those sites. Kagi calls them listicles. "10 reasons why you should straighten your hair" "8 top things to keep in mind" etc etc permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) All of that comes down to exactly what I said. The inability to read search results. I do agree that "ai" articles are horrible. And they'll probably get better at what they do, unfortunately. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kava@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago I think it's not as much an inability but an unwillingness. Although I concede some people are better at using search engines than others. Anybody who had to learn programming online for example is probably better than average. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) All of that comes down to exactly what I said. The inability to read search results. I do agree that "ai" articles are horrible. And they'll probably get better at what they do, unfortunately. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kava@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago I think it's not as much an inability but an unwillingness. Although I concede some people are better at using search engines than others. Anybody who had to learn programming online for example is probably better than average. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kava@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago I think it's not as much an inability but an unwillingness. Although I concede some people are better at using search engines than others. Anybody who had to learn programming online for example is probably better than average. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] butterypowered@feddit.uk 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) My kids still ask me stuff that they should be capable of searching for themselves. I mean, it’s nice to still be needed, but they’re mid-teens now and if search engines are too much effort then good luck surviving in the real world. 😂 (Kids, if you’re reading this many years in the future, I do love you, I promise. 😘😄) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ninjakitty7@kbin.social 2 points 3 years ago To be fair, the search engines of today have lost the war against SEO garbage. 10 years ago google actually gave answers. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ninjakitty7@kbin.social 2 points 3 years ago To be fair, the search engines of today have lost the war against SEO garbage. 10 years ago google actually gave answers. permalink fedilink source parent