you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)
  • [+] 6 points 2 years ago* (1 child)
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    You might be right. I think that the Linux kernel doesn't have an ABI though, so I believe the driver has to be built for the current version of the kernel. I think the idea is also that the driver is signed by the distro, not Microsoft, so the risk of random drivers getting signed accidentally is probably much lower.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    depends, they can also loaded via dkms which may not require it

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments