In the same week large swaths of the US were under extreme heat warnings, Joe Biden’s Justice Department filed its most recent motion to dismiss a landmark climate case by arguing that nothing in the Constitution guarantees the right to a secure climate.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 36 points 3 years ago (2 children)

I mean...it doesn't

Who thinks it does? What a silly idea

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    Correct, the constitution does not literally call out the right to a stable climate, however it's kinda hard to make good on any other constitutional right if populations being culled by extreme heat becomes the new worldwide norm.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (1 child)

    Yeah the declaration of independence mentioned a few things like the rights of Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness, all of which are impossible if the oceans are boiling. These politicians have failed in their duties.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago

    it’s kinda hard to make good on any other constitutional right if populations being culled by extreme heat

    That also does not exist in the US (yet), nor will it even when we pass the 1.5°C target, nor when we keep going beyond it and pass major climate tipping points causing irreversible changes. This kind of hyperbole doesn’t help, when we have a real, serious issue

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -3 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Did they even track and measure weather anywhere close to what we have now?

    Following centuries old doctorines is still weird to me

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (1 child)

    It's the basis of law and order. You can't just do whatever you want, that's a dictatorship.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments