submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by [M] to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 97 points 2 years ago (6 children)

The fact they feel the phrase fuck tankies is acting as a barrier to their participation in 196 should be a wake up call for them to examine their political views.

Unlike their use of the word liberal, which they use to refer to everyone to the right of them on the political spectrum, we are using the word tankie for a single specific group. Tankie means authoritarian communist. Please keep the sign.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [+] 90 points 2 years ago (2 children)
  • [+] 29 points 2 years ago* (2 children)
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    I am a social democrat. I think we should elect socialist politicians through our existing democracy. The socialist politicians will then vote on legislation to regulate the economy and ensure that corporations do not gain an outsized influence in the free market.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 57 points 2 years ago

    Looks at Allende, the Indonesian Genocide, ÖSDAP, and the US Civil War... I am sure, this time the ruling class will just say "aww shucks", and peacefully give up power, rather than fight to retain power like every previous time.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 30 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    Here in the US, the people rule. Since socialist policies are in the interest of the people, they will want to vote for politicians who support socialist policies.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 63 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Here in the US, the people rule.

    This is literally objectively not true:

    https://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/princeton-experts-say-us-no-longer-democracy

    The US is not, and has never been, a democracy, because the people do not direct the actions of the government except on the margins. There is no democratic input on imperialism or capitalism. Those are invariate, and the system is designed to protect those from public influence.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    It's crazy to see a far left news source be used to try to convince people that the US has never been a democracy.

    We have always been a democracy and we thankfully still are a democracy. We are in danger of losing our democracy to fascism however. If we don't fix the flaws in our democratic institutions we will end up in a fascist dictatorship.

    I am well aware we are circling the fascist drain. I also know that the modern neoliberalism movement started by Regan and Thatcher is how we got here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago
    • 70% of Americans want singlepayer healthcare
    • 90% want universal background checks for firearm purchases
    • 75% want Citizen's United repealed

    and yet these and other popular policies remain politically impossible

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago*

    Ok, you know things. Cool. So why are you being so dodgy about hyperspecific political tendencies? Why is such a precarious, controlled, center-left (by ur standard) system like the US worth balancing?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago

    Study: Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens:

    From the abstract:

    Multivariate analysis indicates that economic elites and organized groups representing business interests have substantial independent impacts on U.S. government policy, while average citizens and mass-based interest groups have little or no independent influence.

    further down:

    In the United States, our findings indicate, the majority does not rule — at least not in the causal sense of actually determining policy outcomes. When a majority of citizens disagrees with economic elites and/or with organized interests, they generally lose. Moreover, because of the strong status quo bias built into the U.S. political system, even when fairly large majorities of Americans favor policy change, they generally do not get it.

    What is it, like, 70% of Americans want single payer healthcare?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

    The people rule so effectively in the USA that the candidate with less votes has won 1/3 of presidential elections in the 21st century.

    How can you be a "democracy" if the candidate with the most votes loses the election? I thought that was the number one rule of democracy, the person with the most votes wins.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    Since socialist policies are in the interest of the people, they will want to vote for politicians who support socialist policies.

    Yes, you are right. People voted for Obama in 2008 because he promised nationalized healthcare. Obama also promised to shut down Guantanamo Bay prison. And people voted for Biden in 2020 because he promised student loan debt relief. Both presidents failed to deliver on their promises. Why? Because democracy in America is and always has been "bread and circuses." Voting every two/four years is a distraction. Capital controls America, because it controls the American economy. How many elections do you need to see before you realize that it's always going to be the same shit?

    And any actual socialist will be destroyed by the press. Jeremy Corbin -> anti-Semitic (he's not). Bernie Sanders -> misogynistic racist (he's not, and Biden and Trump both have dozens of sexual assault claims against them). Same shit, different year. Capital, the media, and special interest groups stop all progress from happening in American "democracy." No one has ever voted their way to a revolution.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago

    This has been tried many times and history shows that it's a really effective way of getting yourself couped and get a brutal reactionary regime put in your place. The bourgeoisie is not burdened by any high-minded liberal ideals when it comes to preserving their wealth and power, they are going to do whatever it takes.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Have you ever heard of anarchism and mutual aid

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 30 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I'm personally more afraid of being drafted in a war started by russia but whatevs

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 28 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    What's your point? Are russia not currently being an imperialist nation? They are invading a country for the sake of territory

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Now, just out of the blue, for no discernable reason, the Russian government decided it would just go ahead and conquer a large population in a land where it would have to fight an insurgency for approximately forever. Yes, this is definitely what's happening. A tankie might call this pure MSNBC brain, but there is literally nothing else you need to know in order to understand this conflict. Stay strong, and continue to be the smartest person in the room.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    There is no one to the right of authoritarians who want to silence dissent and use violence to right the inequalities in society.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    If we were at war and they were soldiers, sure. Otherwise it's murder.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago*

    I like this logic. Killing should be a last resort.

    Further, if I had a billion dollars to spend, I'd sooner spend it on organizations like Life After Hate and get them the resources necessary to deconvert and deprogram Nazis than I would on any iteration of our current system of playing whack-a-mole with their censor-evading code words. Or on some Nazi-killing executioner.

    I hate how quick people are to advocate giving up on their fellow humans.

  • source
  • parent