you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 31 points 2 years ago* (5 children)

Unpopular opinion: The Windows Registry, a centralized, strongly typed key:value database for application settings, is actually superior to hundreds of individual dotfiles, each one written in its own janky customized DSL, with its own idea of where it should live in the file system, etc.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago (2 children)
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    The language itself has no type enforcement, the type checking is implemented within nixpkgs. This might seem like pedantry, but it really matters for things like LSPs (text editor autocomplete). I think that's what scares some people off: it's like OG Minecraft, you need to have the wiki/search.nixos.org open while you are doing your editing.

    That being said, the type checking goes much deeper than what the windows registry does - e.g. it won't allow you to enable conflicting services - like grub and systemd-boot - at the same time.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    That is true.

    But, due to the nature of how it works, it can be also used to hide data that the user "should not be aware of".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    So can a dotfile, or any other kind of storage. There's really nothing inherently bad about the registry. Its reputation as a place to hide things in is equal parts selection bias, users' lack of technical understanding, and the marketing of "registry cleaner" apps.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 2 years ago

    But... it is a place to hide things 🀨.

    I won't argue about leftovers when uninstallig, some package managers do that as well, plus it's not really the registry's fault, that's just bad or badly configured installers/uninstallers.

  • source
  • parent