you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 40 points 2 years ago (1 child)

There were such attempts in the past... The false positive rates were around 30-80%...

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    To be fair towards Reddit here, AI now is vastly different and more capable for this kind of stuff than it was years ago.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    It's also less capable than human moderators so...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I agree. What's your point? I'm not defending the choice to use AI for that purpose. I'm saying AI from years ago can't be compared to the current AI

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    When it comes to moderation, I don't really think so tbh. And it's unfair to use it anyways so it doesn't matter

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I agree it's not fair, unless there's some human element to it that checks and corrects the AI's choices.

    That said, modern AI is pretty capable of recognising something like harassment, I'd say.

    Just to be clear, I'm not defending Reddit for choosing AI over human moderation

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Why's it unfair? They were never going to pay people anyways.

    I agree its the wrong decision but unfair is an interesting word to me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I meant that it's unfair to Reddit users because they can get banned for no reason. But I guess there's a better word for it. My vocabulary is at like 2nd grade level lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments