161
What types of services are you not willing to self-host? (lemmy.world)
submitted 3 years ago by to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
125 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

For example, something that is too complex for your comfort level, a security concern, or maybe your hardware can’t keep up with the service’s needs?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 17 points 3 years ago (2 children)

Smart move, unless you really know what you're doing and have redundancy. When I first made the switch from Lastpass to Bitwarden I had tried to host the vault myself instead of using the cloud version, which worked fine right up until the moment I had a server outage and lost access to all my passwords.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [+] 20 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)
    [deleted]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 8 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    I think that's what's kept me at KeePass rather than moving to something like Bitwarden. Since it's file-level encryption, anything that can serve files can also serve my KeePass database. When I upgrade servers or change to different services, restoring my database is as simple as throwing the file into that new service and going on with my life.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 13 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Eh, the clients all cache your vault. It shouldn't be a huge issue for it to be down even for a few days.

    But I do upload encrypted backups of the server every 6 hours to cloud storage

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •