▲ 36 ▼ Yemen's Houthis say they targeted 'Israeli ship MSC SKY' in the Arabian Sea (www.reuters.com) submitted 2 years ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml 58 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) What part are you replying to with this? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I'm referring to US doing strikes in Yemen, this is nothing new and this strategy showed no results over past 8 years. No reason to expect anything different going forward. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Right, you're talking about who lasts longer? I thought you were talking about the no impact thing and was confused. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) It's both, Yemenis have shown that they've been able to last for 8 years without any clear impact from the bombing strategy. The impact from Yemeni blockade is visible, we see economic costs for the west. The impact from bombing in terms of Yemen being able to pursue its policies is not clear because we don't see their policies change or become less effective. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) So when you meant no impact you were thinking of in the way that if they can still shoot missiles that means there has been no impact? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Right, I'm saying the strikes are not achieving a change in behavior or capability. So, there is no impact in terms of what Yemen is doing whether US carries strikes out or not. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) I guess I thought you meant the strikes were having no impact as in genuinely zero impact permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) I mean, I'm sure they're having impact killing civilians and destroying infrastructure in Yemen. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Missile firing infrastructure and capability is sorta the target. Luckily first civilian death was just yesterday and so far I think that's the only one. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) If missile firing infrastructure is the target, then it's pretty clear that US is not capable of doing any meaningful damage to this infrastructure. Again, the original point was that US is unable to achieve its stated goals while Yemen is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago Yes, I just misunderstood it as a more literal "no impact" than what you were saying. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I'm referring to US doing strikes in Yemen, this is nothing new and this strategy showed no results over past 8 years. No reason to expect anything different going forward. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Right, you're talking about who lasts longer? I thought you were talking about the no impact thing and was confused. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) It's both, Yemenis have shown that they've been able to last for 8 years without any clear impact from the bombing strategy. The impact from Yemeni blockade is visible, we see economic costs for the west. The impact from bombing in terms of Yemen being able to pursue its policies is not clear because we don't see their policies change or become less effective. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) So when you meant no impact you were thinking of in the way that if they can still shoot missiles that means there has been no impact? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Right, I'm saying the strikes are not achieving a change in behavior or capability. So, there is no impact in terms of what Yemen is doing whether US carries strikes out or not. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) I guess I thought you meant the strikes were having no impact as in genuinely zero impact permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) I mean, I'm sure they're having impact killing civilians and destroying infrastructure in Yemen. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Missile firing infrastructure and capability is sorta the target. Luckily first civilian death was just yesterday and so far I think that's the only one. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) If missile firing infrastructure is the target, then it's pretty clear that US is not capable of doing any meaningful damage to this infrastructure. Again, the original point was that US is unable to achieve its stated goals while Yemen is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago Yes, I just misunderstood it as a more literal "no impact" than what you were saying. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Right, you're talking about who lasts longer? I thought you were talking about the no impact thing and was confused. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) It's both, Yemenis have shown that they've been able to last for 8 years without any clear impact from the bombing strategy. The impact from Yemeni blockade is visible, we see economic costs for the west. The impact from bombing in terms of Yemen being able to pursue its policies is not clear because we don't see their policies change or become less effective. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) So when you meant no impact you were thinking of in the way that if they can still shoot missiles that means there has been no impact? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Right, I'm saying the strikes are not achieving a change in behavior or capability. So, there is no impact in terms of what Yemen is doing whether US carries strikes out or not. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) I guess I thought you meant the strikes were having no impact as in genuinely zero impact permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) I mean, I'm sure they're having impact killing civilians and destroying infrastructure in Yemen. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Missile firing infrastructure and capability is sorta the target. Luckily first civilian death was just yesterday and so far I think that's the only one. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) If missile firing infrastructure is the target, then it's pretty clear that US is not capable of doing any meaningful damage to this infrastructure. Again, the original point was that US is unable to achieve its stated goals while Yemen is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago Yes, I just misunderstood it as a more literal "no impact" than what you were saying. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) It's both, Yemenis have shown that they've been able to last for 8 years without any clear impact from the bombing strategy. The impact from Yemeni blockade is visible, we see economic costs for the west. The impact from bombing in terms of Yemen being able to pursue its policies is not clear because we don't see their policies change or become less effective. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) So when you meant no impact you were thinking of in the way that if they can still shoot missiles that means there has been no impact? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Right, I'm saying the strikes are not achieving a change in behavior or capability. So, there is no impact in terms of what Yemen is doing whether US carries strikes out or not. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) I guess I thought you meant the strikes were having no impact as in genuinely zero impact permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) I mean, I'm sure they're having impact killing civilians and destroying infrastructure in Yemen. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Missile firing infrastructure and capability is sorta the target. Luckily first civilian death was just yesterday and so far I think that's the only one. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) If missile firing infrastructure is the target, then it's pretty clear that US is not capable of doing any meaningful damage to this infrastructure. Again, the original point was that US is unable to achieve its stated goals while Yemen is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago Yes, I just misunderstood it as a more literal "no impact" than what you were saying. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) So when you meant no impact you were thinking of in the way that if they can still shoot missiles that means there has been no impact? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Right, I'm saying the strikes are not achieving a change in behavior or capability. So, there is no impact in terms of what Yemen is doing whether US carries strikes out or not. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) I guess I thought you meant the strikes were having no impact as in genuinely zero impact permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) I mean, I'm sure they're having impact killing civilians and destroying infrastructure in Yemen. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Missile firing infrastructure and capability is sorta the target. Luckily first civilian death was just yesterday and so far I think that's the only one. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) If missile firing infrastructure is the target, then it's pretty clear that US is not capable of doing any meaningful damage to this infrastructure. Again, the original point was that US is unable to achieve its stated goals while Yemen is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago Yes, I just misunderstood it as a more literal "no impact" than what you were saying. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Right, I'm saying the strikes are not achieving a change in behavior or capability. So, there is no impact in terms of what Yemen is doing whether US carries strikes out or not. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) I guess I thought you meant the strikes were having no impact as in genuinely zero impact permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) I mean, I'm sure they're having impact killing civilians and destroying infrastructure in Yemen. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Missile firing infrastructure and capability is sorta the target. Luckily first civilian death was just yesterday and so far I think that's the only one. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) If missile firing infrastructure is the target, then it's pretty clear that US is not capable of doing any meaningful damage to this infrastructure. Again, the original point was that US is unable to achieve its stated goals while Yemen is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago Yes, I just misunderstood it as a more literal "no impact" than what you were saying. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) I guess I thought you meant the strikes were having no impact as in genuinely zero impact permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) I mean, I'm sure they're having impact killing civilians and destroying infrastructure in Yemen. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Missile firing infrastructure and capability is sorta the target. Luckily first civilian death was just yesterday and so far I think that's the only one. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) If missile firing infrastructure is the target, then it's pretty clear that US is not capable of doing any meaningful damage to this infrastructure. Again, the original point was that US is unable to achieve its stated goals while Yemen is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago Yes, I just misunderstood it as a more literal "no impact" than what you were saying. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) I mean, I'm sure they're having impact killing civilians and destroying infrastructure in Yemen. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Missile firing infrastructure and capability is sorta the target. Luckily first civilian death was just yesterday and so far I think that's the only one. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) If missile firing infrastructure is the target, then it's pretty clear that US is not capable of doing any meaningful damage to this infrastructure. Again, the original point was that US is unable to achieve its stated goals while Yemen is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago Yes, I just misunderstood it as a more literal "no impact" than what you were saying. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Missile firing infrastructure and capability is sorta the target. Luckily first civilian death was just yesterday and so far I think that's the only one. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) If missile firing infrastructure is the target, then it's pretty clear that US is not capable of doing any meaningful damage to this infrastructure. Again, the original point was that US is unable to achieve its stated goals while Yemen is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago Yes, I just misunderstood it as a more literal "no impact" than what you were saying. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) If missile firing infrastructure is the target, then it's pretty clear that US is not capable of doing any meaningful damage to this infrastructure. Again, the original point was that US is unable to achieve its stated goals while Yemen is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago Yes, I just misunderstood it as a more literal "no impact" than what you were saying. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago Yes, I just misunderstood it as a more literal "no impact" than what you were saying. permalink fedilink source parent