▲ 397 ▼ HDMI Forum Rejects Open-Source HDMI 2.1 Driver Support Sought By AMD - Phoronix (www.phoronix.com) submitted 2 years ago by ruffsl@programming.dev to c/linux@lemmy.ml 62 comments fedilink hide all child comments For three years there has been a bug report around 4K@120Hz being unavailable via HDMI 2.1 on the AMD Linux driver. The wait continues...
[–] MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world 72 points 2 years ago (1 child) Alright, displayport, here we come permalink fedilink source hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] n3m37h@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 2 years ago (1 child) I've been on the DP bandwagon since using my GTX 660Ti permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 child) I don’t think I’ve ever used hdmi by choice. It’s always been VGA > DVI > DisplayPort. The only times I use HDMI is consoles or stupid monitors either only 1 DP and a bunch of HDMI. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] flashgnash@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Why VGA and DVI? I had thought they were limited in their max resolution/refresh rate permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago DVI and vga were mostly on older devices. HDMI was inferior to dual link dvi until I’d switched to DisplayPort. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] n3m37h@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 2 years ago (1 child) I've been on the DP bandwagon since using my GTX 660Ti permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 child) I don’t think I’ve ever used hdmi by choice. It’s always been VGA > DVI > DisplayPort. The only times I use HDMI is consoles or stupid monitors either only 1 DP and a bunch of HDMI. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] flashgnash@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Why VGA and DVI? I had thought they were limited in their max resolution/refresh rate permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago DVI and vga were mostly on older devices. HDMI was inferior to dual link dvi until I’d switched to DisplayPort. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 child) I don’t think I’ve ever used hdmi by choice. It’s always been VGA > DVI > DisplayPort. The only times I use HDMI is consoles or stupid monitors either only 1 DP and a bunch of HDMI. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] flashgnash@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Why VGA and DVI? I had thought they were limited in their max resolution/refresh rate permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago DVI and vga were mostly on older devices. HDMI was inferior to dual link dvi until I’d switched to DisplayPort. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] flashgnash@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Why VGA and DVI? I had thought they were limited in their max resolution/refresh rate permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago DVI and vga were mostly on older devices. HDMI was inferior to dual link dvi until I’d switched to DisplayPort. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago DVI and vga were mostly on older devices. HDMI was inferior to dual link dvi until I’d switched to DisplayPort. permalink fedilink source parent