▲ 78 ▼ Google CEO says Gemini AI diversity errors are ‘completely unacceptable’ (www.theverge.com) submitted 2 years ago by L4s@lemmy.world [M, B] to c/technology@lemmy.world 22 comments fedilink hide all child comments Google CEO says Gemini AI diversity errors are ‘completely unacceptable’::In an internal memo, Google CEO Sundar Pichai told employees that the historically inaccurate photos generated by the company’s Gemini AI were ‘completely unacceptable.’
[–] iopq@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) They had QA people, this was actually intended behavior permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 9 points 2 years ago* (1 child) no? alphabet lost $90bil in value over this, why on earth would an entity choose to make a design decision that breaks investor confidence? the initial choice to make the AI “diverse,” sure, that’s intentional. but the method by which it was done had unintentional consequences, and that is the problem which QA would have fixed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] iopq@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (1 child) They got the result they wanted, they just didn't get the response they wanted from the public. There's no way to QA this permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) there’s no way to QA public response https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Focus_group there are literally dozens of ways marketers have come up with to do exactly what you are claiming is impossible 🙃 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] iopq@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago It's not the QA team's job to run a focus group. Ideally, you decide what customers want before building a product. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 9 points 2 years ago* (1 child) no? alphabet lost $90bil in value over this, why on earth would an entity choose to make a design decision that breaks investor confidence? the initial choice to make the AI “diverse,” sure, that’s intentional. but the method by which it was done had unintentional consequences, and that is the problem which QA would have fixed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] iopq@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (1 child) They got the result they wanted, they just didn't get the response they wanted from the public. There's no way to QA this permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) there’s no way to QA public response https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Focus_group there are literally dozens of ways marketers have come up with to do exactly what you are claiming is impossible 🙃 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] iopq@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago It's not the QA team's job to run a focus group. Ideally, you decide what customers want before building a product. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] iopq@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (1 child) They got the result they wanted, they just didn't get the response they wanted from the public. There's no way to QA this permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) there’s no way to QA public response https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Focus_group there are literally dozens of ways marketers have come up with to do exactly what you are claiming is impossible 🙃 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] iopq@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago It's not the QA team's job to run a focus group. Ideally, you decide what customers want before building a product. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) there’s no way to QA public response https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Focus_group there are literally dozens of ways marketers have come up with to do exactly what you are claiming is impossible 🙃 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] iopq@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago It's not the QA team's job to run a focus group. Ideally, you decide what customers want before building a product. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] iopq@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago It's not the QA team's job to run a focus group. Ideally, you decide what customers want before building a product. permalink fedilink source parent