▲ 106 ▼ How much of what you self-host do you keep LAN only over making accessible across the internet? (lemm.ee) submitted 2 years ago by ALostInquirer@lemm.ee to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world 94 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 2 years ago (3 children) 100% is lan only cause my isp is a cunt permalink fedilink source hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Tailscale with the Funnel feature enabled should work for most ISPs, since it's setup via an outbound connection. Though maybe they're Super Cunts and block that too. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 7 points 2 years ago Prompt: Super Cunt, photorealistic, in the style of Jill Greenberg. permalink fedilink source parent [–] MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Ah, CG-NAT, is it? There are workarounds permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago NAT to extremes.... it's Starlink so I think I'm almost completely obfuscated from the internet entirely. quite frankly i don't really host anything that needs to be accessible from the general Internet so I never bothered with workarounds. permalink fedilink source parent [–] brayd@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 2 years ago I had the same issue. Wrote another comment here explaining my setup to solve my ISP issue. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Tailscale with the Funnel feature enabled should work for most ISPs, since it's setup via an outbound connection. Though maybe they're Super Cunts and block that too. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 7 points 2 years ago Prompt: Super Cunt, photorealistic, in the style of Jill Greenberg. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 7 points 2 years ago Prompt: Super Cunt, photorealistic, in the style of Jill Greenberg. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Ah, CG-NAT, is it? There are workarounds permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago NAT to extremes.... it's Starlink so I think I'm almost completely obfuscated from the internet entirely. quite frankly i don't really host anything that needs to be accessible from the general Internet so I never bothered with workarounds. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago NAT to extremes.... it's Starlink so I think I'm almost completely obfuscated from the internet entirely. quite frankly i don't really host anything that needs to be accessible from the general Internet so I never bothered with workarounds. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] brayd@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 2 years ago I had the same issue. Wrote another comment here explaining my setup to solve my ISP issue. permalink fedilink source parent