▲ 167 ▼ Bluesky opens up federation, letting anyone run their own server | TechCrunch (techcrunch.com) submitted 2 years ago by clgoh@lemmy.ca to c/fediverse@lemmy.world 60 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (2 children) CC BY-NC-SA 4.0! Why? You realize that you reserve more rights by not including a license than by including one, right? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] HKayn@dormi.zone 3 points 2 years ago Multiple people on here have already tried to tell them. permalink fedilink source parent [–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Why AI permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago (1 child) So you’re hoping judges will collectively reinterpret the definition of fair use under copyright law to exclude the training of AI models? Good luck with that lol Also, most of your comments wouldn’t be considered copyrightable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Are you a legal expert? Lawyer? Judge? What gives you any authority on copyright? CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) I’m not an authority on copyright, nor did I claim to be. I’m just aware of my surroundings. And again, even if courts suddenly decide that training AI isn’t fair use, you don’t have to attach a license to your comments for it to apply. Content that you produce is copyrighted by default, with all rights reserved. You are exclusively giving away rights by attaching a CC license, not reserving them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] onlinepersona@programming.dev -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) I’m not an authority on copyright, nor did I claim to be. Didn't read further than this. Your opinion is unimportant on the matter. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago You should reconsider that, because you are most definitely giving up many of your rights to your content. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] HKayn@dormi.zone 3 points 2 years ago Multiple people on here have already tried to tell them. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Why AI permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago (1 child) So you’re hoping judges will collectively reinterpret the definition of fair use under copyright law to exclude the training of AI models? Good luck with that lol Also, most of your comments wouldn’t be considered copyrightable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Are you a legal expert? Lawyer? Judge? What gives you any authority on copyright? CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) I’m not an authority on copyright, nor did I claim to be. I’m just aware of my surroundings. And again, even if courts suddenly decide that training AI isn’t fair use, you don’t have to attach a license to your comments for it to apply. Content that you produce is copyrighted by default, with all rights reserved. You are exclusively giving away rights by attaching a CC license, not reserving them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] onlinepersona@programming.dev -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) I’m not an authority on copyright, nor did I claim to be. Didn't read further than this. Your opinion is unimportant on the matter. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago You should reconsider that, because you are most definitely giving up many of your rights to your content. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago (1 child) So you’re hoping judges will collectively reinterpret the definition of fair use under copyright law to exclude the training of AI models? Good luck with that lol Also, most of your comments wouldn’t be considered copyrightable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Are you a legal expert? Lawyer? Judge? What gives you any authority on copyright? CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) I’m not an authority on copyright, nor did I claim to be. I’m just aware of my surroundings. And again, even if courts suddenly decide that training AI isn’t fair use, you don’t have to attach a license to your comments for it to apply. Content that you produce is copyrighted by default, with all rights reserved. You are exclusively giving away rights by attaching a CC license, not reserving them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] onlinepersona@programming.dev -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) I’m not an authority on copyright, nor did I claim to be. Didn't read further than this. Your opinion is unimportant on the matter. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago You should reconsider that, because you are most definitely giving up many of your rights to your content. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Are you a legal expert? Lawyer? Judge? What gives you any authority on copyright? CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) I’m not an authority on copyright, nor did I claim to be. I’m just aware of my surroundings. And again, even if courts suddenly decide that training AI isn’t fair use, you don’t have to attach a license to your comments for it to apply. Content that you produce is copyrighted by default, with all rights reserved. You are exclusively giving away rights by attaching a CC license, not reserving them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] onlinepersona@programming.dev -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) I’m not an authority on copyright, nor did I claim to be. Didn't read further than this. Your opinion is unimportant on the matter. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago You should reconsider that, because you are most definitely giving up many of your rights to your content. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) I’m not an authority on copyright, nor did I claim to be. I’m just aware of my surroundings. And again, even if courts suddenly decide that training AI isn’t fair use, you don’t have to attach a license to your comments for it to apply. Content that you produce is copyrighted by default, with all rights reserved. You are exclusively giving away rights by attaching a CC license, not reserving them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] onlinepersona@programming.dev -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) I’m not an authority on copyright, nor did I claim to be. Didn't read further than this. Your opinion is unimportant on the matter. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago You should reconsider that, because you are most definitely giving up many of your rights to your content. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) I’m not an authority on copyright, nor did I claim to be. Didn't read further than this. Your opinion is unimportant on the matter. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago You should reconsider that, because you are most definitely giving up many of your rights to your content. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago You should reconsider that, because you are most definitely giving up many of your rights to your content. permalink fedilink source parent