Someone used Shutterstock's AI image generator to create them.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 34 points 2 years ago (3 children)

This may be controversial, but I don't care what kind of AI-generated images people create as long as it's obvious they're not reality. Where I worry is the creation of believable false narratives, from explicit deepfakes of real people to completely fictional newsworthy events.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    It's not really CSAM if there is no abuse happening, is it?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    I've read that pedophiles are more likely to act out on their urges if they have access to real images. I would guess that this also applies for ai generated images too, even if they don't look 100% real, but I could be wrong on that. Whatever stops them from abusing kids is what I'm for.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    I want to say research on the subject has been inconclusive overall. I'd certainly update my view given convincing evidence that fictional images lead to abuse of real children.

    Of course, none of that has anything to do with the non-explicit video linked elsewhere in this thread of an adult woman using the toilet.

  • source
  • parent