▲ -92 ▼ "Microwaves Are Bad For You: 5 Reasons Why Microwave Oven Cooking Is Harming Your Health" (www.medicaldaily.com) submitted 3 years ago by walnutwalrus@lemmy.world to c/general@lemmy.world 67 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 31 points 3 years ago (1 child) This pseudo-science bullshit does not belong on Lemmy. https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/medical-daily/ permalink fedilink source hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] walnutwalrus@lemmy.world [S] -18 points 3 years ago (2 children) I wouldn't call it pseudoscience, and your link could be "debunked" by people with opposing views; it would be more helpful to discuss the issue at hand rather than respond as such permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] oldGregg@lemm.ee 10 points 3 years ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Rozauhtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 3 years ago "Bullshit", usually. permalink fedilink source parent [+] walnutwalrus@lemmy.world [S] -9 points 3 years ago (1 child) "everything that is wrong is pseudoscience" how about a hypothesis? doctors prescribed cancer-causing cigarettes at one time, right? There are people raising concerns over the dangers of microwaves, that is all. We can have a discussion about it, or I can just call the view that "microwaves are safe" "pseudoscience"... but then there isn't really much of a discussion. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] oldGregg@lemm.ee 6 points 3 years ago* [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 9 points 3 years ago That's the problem. You believe the nonsense. You can't provide credible sources because the nonsense is not credible it is unworthy of discussion. There is no middle ground. It is garbage. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] walnutwalrus@lemmy.world [S] -18 points 3 years ago (2 children) I wouldn't call it pseudoscience, and your link could be "debunked" by people with opposing views; it would be more helpful to discuss the issue at hand rather than respond as such permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] oldGregg@lemm.ee 10 points 3 years ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Rozauhtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 3 years ago "Bullshit", usually. permalink fedilink source parent [+] walnutwalrus@lemmy.world [S] -9 points 3 years ago (1 child) "everything that is wrong is pseudoscience" how about a hypothesis? doctors prescribed cancer-causing cigarettes at one time, right? There are people raising concerns over the dangers of microwaves, that is all. We can have a discussion about it, or I can just call the view that "microwaves are safe" "pseudoscience"... but then there isn't really much of a discussion. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] oldGregg@lemm.ee 6 points 3 years ago* [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 9 points 3 years ago That's the problem. You believe the nonsense. You can't provide credible sources because the nonsense is not credible it is unworthy of discussion. There is no middle ground. It is garbage. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] oldGregg@lemm.ee 10 points 3 years ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Rozauhtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 3 years ago "Bullshit", usually. permalink fedilink source parent [+] walnutwalrus@lemmy.world [S] -9 points 3 years ago (1 child) "everything that is wrong is pseudoscience" how about a hypothesis? doctors prescribed cancer-causing cigarettes at one time, right? There are people raising concerns over the dangers of microwaves, that is all. We can have a discussion about it, or I can just call the view that "microwaves are safe" "pseudoscience"... but then there isn't really much of a discussion. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] oldGregg@lemm.ee 6 points 3 years ago* [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Rozauhtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 3 years ago "Bullshit", usually. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] walnutwalrus@lemmy.world [S] -9 points 3 years ago (1 child) "everything that is wrong is pseudoscience" how about a hypothesis? doctors prescribed cancer-causing cigarettes at one time, right? There are people raising concerns over the dangers of microwaves, that is all. We can have a discussion about it, or I can just call the view that "microwaves are safe" "pseudoscience"... but then there isn't really much of a discussion. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] oldGregg@lemm.ee 6 points 3 years ago* [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 9 points 3 years ago That's the problem. You believe the nonsense. You can't provide credible sources because the nonsense is not credible it is unworthy of discussion. There is no middle ground. It is garbage. permalink fedilink source parent