489
Google apologizes for ‘missing the mark’ after Gemini generated racially diverse Nazis (www.theverge.com)
submitted 2 years ago by [M, B] to c/technology@lemmy.world
197 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Google apologizes for ‘missing the mark’ after Gemini generated racially diverse Nazis::Google says it’s aware of historically inaccurate results for its Gemini AI image generator, following criticism that it depicted historically white groups as people of color.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 8 points 2 years ago (1 child)

Knowledge is a bit more than just handling data, and in terms of intelligence it also involves understanding. I don’t think knowledge in an intelligent sense can be reduced to summarising data to keywords, and the reverse.

In those terms an encyclopaedia is also knowledge, but not in an intelligent way.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [+] -7 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I'm not saying knowledge is summarising data to keywords, where did you get that?

    Intelligence is compression, and the training process compresses data. There is no "summarising" here.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    "Intelligence is compression" is it?

    So are you going to like... explain how that makes any sense at all, or how to deal with the many, many obvious counterexamples?

    Do I need to spell this out? Like... a ZIP algorithm is not what anyone would call "intelligent". Nor is the ZIP archive.

    Do you really think you can just say "intelligence is compression" and expect people to believe you?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [+] -6 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I could gladly provide research that supports my position! But I don't think you're interested in that - you didn't ask for an explanation or for evidence, instead you're discounting the idea with snark, so I'll save myself the time.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I'd like to see the research.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] -4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

    I'll look it up once I'm off work and reply with another comment :)

    Edit: with all the downvotes, I'm not interested in continuing this broader discussion. Lemmy isn't a good place to talk about anything close to AI. So I won't spend time to find resources, sorry!

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent