Some people were very cross with him for turning his back on Stalin and centering with the US. But, regardless, he needed them to run the country... so, he decided not to change the name of the party to "socialist" to get on the good side of the Stallinists in Yugoslavia. This was planned, but it was never done. The name stayed KPJ (Communist Party of Yugoslavia).

My point is, sacraficies have to be made for the greater good. Sometimes that means doing horrible things to others. Is that justified? Depends how you look at things... if killing a few thousand people will save you from having an actual war with hundreds of thousands of casualties... the choice is tough, but it has to be done. Tito knew this and he wasn't proud of what he did, but he knew it had to be done. Same goes for Goli Otok and other nationalists that were killed on his watch. Yes, it's not pretty, but it has to he done... to keep the piece.

You have to understand, the Balkans haven't seen piece in centuries, there was always turmoil here. And then shows up a guy that promises piece, equality and ruling of the people... and he actually did just that! Not just on paper, there was piece! Yes, I do agree that that comes at a price. Would I make the same choices if, let's say, I was in charge and that could avoid the war in Bosnia? Yes, I most defintely would. I won't be proud of it and will probably try to forget it ever happend (so I could keep on living... otherwise, I'd probably commit suicide), but yes, I'd do it.