Samsung sees 95% drop in profits for a second consecutive quarter::Today, Samsung posted its Q2 2023 financial results. The report says Samsung's profits have dropped considerably compared to last year.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 3 years ago (3 children)

When money is tight you might use your phone for a year or two longer. 1000 Euro phones also don't help the matter.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    It also seems like the whole you gotta upgrade every other month hype has long since died down. It's not the exponential improvements that it was ten or twelve years ago.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago

    I couldn't agree more. I have a Zfold 2 that I've had since launch (3 years) and I look at the phones on offer now that I have an upgrade available and I see no reason to upgrade to a new phone for a marginally better camera and processor, there hasn't been enough innovation in mobile tech in that time to warrant paying another £1000+ over another 3 years, I'll rock this phone phone until it dies the same way I did my Note 9.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Yeah, I've had my LG G8 for four years now and I'm just starting to look for replacements. Unfortunately the G8 is known for the battery being very hard to replace or I would be looking into a battery replacement service instead to get a couple more years of useful life.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (2 children)

    While I don’t use a Samsung, I am over half way through my phones fifth year. Other than a battery replacement I’ve had literally no problems whatsoever.

    If only lifespan and right to repair were written into law everywhere.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (2 children)

    Software updates are the problem unfortunately

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (3 children)

    Developers require money, and software maintenance requires lots of developers, testers and other people.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago

    No not really, formula is no more than 10% production costs pa unless w produced poorly to begin with. It’s even less if you’re running multiple versions of roughly the same thing then the costs are spread over those versions.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago

    Yes and no. Installing last version of android on a pixel 4 is most likely absolutely fine. And keeping at least security support is likely not a big deal. 3 years of security update support it is clearly a finance department decision. Why 3, why not 3 and half? Why not 4?

    Just because they need predictability in sales, and they attached the support to the "classical" number of years after which you'd like a customer to buy a new tech product. 3 years has always been a magic number for hardware companies, since forever

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    I wonder why this is not a problem for pcs though

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Because PCs are from a time before tech monopolies. They are based on a spec that allows different vendors to work together. As a result there is more competition, more options for repair, etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago

    Yes, though technically they started out as reverse engineered clones. There were tons of incompatible microcomputer brands before the IBM PC. Then companies like Compaq put out "PC compatible" clones based on specs that came from reverse engineering of the IBM PC. Over time, things evolved toward deliberate standardization.

    Imagine the dumpster fire of legal action, which courts would likely side with, if someone put out hardware that was 1:1 compatible with the iPhone and iOS would run on it. That's basically what happened, though MS DOS was produced by an additional party instead of IBM.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago

    It kinda is. Windows 11 won't run on older hardware and end of life of the latest version of Win 10 is coming up in 2 years or so. And a bunch of PCs weren't really ready for Win 10 when that replaced Win 7/8 and again, support for those dropped at some point.

    Lifetimes are usually more lenient with PCs, but it still happens. You can switch to Linux of course, but then there are alternatives for many smartphones as well.

  • source
  • parent