▲ 22 ▼ Brave will not add Web Integration support (twitter.com) submitted 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) by mrmanager@lemmy.today to c/technology@lemmy.world 85 comments fedilink hide all child comments I think we need all support we can get to fight Google on this, so I welcome Brave here actually. Use this link to avoid going to Twitter: https://nitter.kavin.rocks/BrendanEich/status/1684561924191842304
[–] Asudox@lemmy.world 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) Time to switch to Firefox as the base. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] GustavoM@lemmy.world 0 points 3 years ago (2 children) Amen. I'm just waiting for them to screw everything up and I'll follow along. t. Currently using Brave permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] fubbernuckin@lemmy.world 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) Just use Firefox. I already like it better than brave personally. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Black616Angel@feddit.de 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) It really isn't though. I also started using Firefox recently and I miss tab groups on mobile as well as on my PC. Yes, there is the simple tab groups add-on, but it just doesn't compare. Brave is also easier to set up ad-blocking, because it comes with ad-block enabled and script-blocking two clicks away. Don't get me wrong, I will continue to use FF, but Brave has some features, FF does not have (yet). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 1 point 3 years ago The more that use Chromiun, the more likely WEI will be rolled out and the death of ad blockers comes quicker. permalink fedilink source parent [–] PlantJam@lemmy.world 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) No need to wait, Firefox is already a strong competitor (in terms of features, not market share). Adblock on Firefox mobile makes mobile sites so much easier to use. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] moitoi@feddit.de 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) I don't know how people navigate the internet without adblock on mobile. Each website is a nightmare with the majority of the screen being ads. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] capacitor@reddthat.com 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Yeah, ff mobile may be complete garbage UX/security wise, but its the only usable mobile browser IMO, simply because of ublock support. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] d3vnu1l@programming.dev 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) What makes Firefox on mobile complete garbage security wise? Genuinely curious. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] capacitor@reddthat.com 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) According to the GrapheneOS docs Firefox does not have internal sandboxing on Android. Apparently Firefox's sandbox is still substantially weaker than chromium and it is currently much more vulnerable to exploitation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] d3vnu1l@programming.dev 1 point 3 years ago Oh that's right. I read the same thing some time ago and had completely forgotten. Thanks for bringing it up. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] GustavoM@lemmy.world 0 points 3 years ago (2 children) Amen. I'm just waiting for them to screw everything up and I'll follow along. t. Currently using Brave permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] fubbernuckin@lemmy.world 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) Just use Firefox. I already like it better than brave personally. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Black616Angel@feddit.de 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) It really isn't though. I also started using Firefox recently and I miss tab groups on mobile as well as on my PC. Yes, there is the simple tab groups add-on, but it just doesn't compare. Brave is also easier to set up ad-blocking, because it comes with ad-block enabled and script-blocking two clicks away. Don't get me wrong, I will continue to use FF, but Brave has some features, FF does not have (yet). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 1 point 3 years ago The more that use Chromiun, the more likely WEI will be rolled out and the death of ad blockers comes quicker. permalink fedilink source parent [–] PlantJam@lemmy.world 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) No need to wait, Firefox is already a strong competitor (in terms of features, not market share). Adblock on Firefox mobile makes mobile sites so much easier to use. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] moitoi@feddit.de 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) I don't know how people navigate the internet without adblock on mobile. Each website is a nightmare with the majority of the screen being ads. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] capacitor@reddthat.com 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Yeah, ff mobile may be complete garbage UX/security wise, but its the only usable mobile browser IMO, simply because of ublock support. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] d3vnu1l@programming.dev 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) What makes Firefox on mobile complete garbage security wise? Genuinely curious. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] capacitor@reddthat.com 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) According to the GrapheneOS docs Firefox does not have internal sandboxing on Android. Apparently Firefox's sandbox is still substantially weaker than chromium and it is currently much more vulnerable to exploitation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] d3vnu1l@programming.dev 1 point 3 years ago Oh that's right. I read the same thing some time ago and had completely forgotten. Thanks for bringing it up. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] fubbernuckin@lemmy.world 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) Just use Firefox. I already like it better than brave personally. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Black616Angel@feddit.de 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) It really isn't though. I also started using Firefox recently and I miss tab groups on mobile as well as on my PC. Yes, there is the simple tab groups add-on, but it just doesn't compare. Brave is also easier to set up ad-blocking, because it comes with ad-block enabled and script-blocking two clicks away. Don't get me wrong, I will continue to use FF, but Brave has some features, FF does not have (yet). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 1 point 3 years ago The more that use Chromiun, the more likely WEI will be rolled out and the death of ad blockers comes quicker. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Black616Angel@feddit.de 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) It really isn't though. I also started using Firefox recently and I miss tab groups on mobile as well as on my PC. Yes, there is the simple tab groups add-on, but it just doesn't compare. Brave is also easier to set up ad-blocking, because it comes with ad-block enabled and script-blocking two clicks away. Don't get me wrong, I will continue to use FF, but Brave has some features, FF does not have (yet). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 1 point 3 years ago The more that use Chromiun, the more likely WEI will be rolled out and the death of ad blockers comes quicker. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 1 point 3 years ago The more that use Chromiun, the more likely WEI will be rolled out and the death of ad blockers comes quicker. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] PlantJam@lemmy.world 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) No need to wait, Firefox is already a strong competitor (in terms of features, not market share). Adblock on Firefox mobile makes mobile sites so much easier to use. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] moitoi@feddit.de 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) I don't know how people navigate the internet without adblock on mobile. Each website is a nightmare with the majority of the screen being ads. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] capacitor@reddthat.com 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Yeah, ff mobile may be complete garbage UX/security wise, but its the only usable mobile browser IMO, simply because of ublock support. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] d3vnu1l@programming.dev 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) What makes Firefox on mobile complete garbage security wise? Genuinely curious. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] capacitor@reddthat.com 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) According to the GrapheneOS docs Firefox does not have internal sandboxing on Android. Apparently Firefox's sandbox is still substantially weaker than chromium and it is currently much more vulnerable to exploitation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] d3vnu1l@programming.dev 1 point 3 years ago Oh that's right. I read the same thing some time ago and had completely forgotten. Thanks for bringing it up. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] moitoi@feddit.de 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) I don't know how people navigate the internet without adblock on mobile. Each website is a nightmare with the majority of the screen being ads. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] capacitor@reddthat.com 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Yeah, ff mobile may be complete garbage UX/security wise, but its the only usable mobile browser IMO, simply because of ublock support. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] d3vnu1l@programming.dev 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) What makes Firefox on mobile complete garbage security wise? Genuinely curious. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] capacitor@reddthat.com 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) According to the GrapheneOS docs Firefox does not have internal sandboxing on Android. Apparently Firefox's sandbox is still substantially weaker than chromium and it is currently much more vulnerable to exploitation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] d3vnu1l@programming.dev 1 point 3 years ago Oh that's right. I read the same thing some time ago and had completely forgotten. Thanks for bringing it up. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] capacitor@reddthat.com 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Yeah, ff mobile may be complete garbage UX/security wise, but its the only usable mobile browser IMO, simply because of ublock support. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] d3vnu1l@programming.dev 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) What makes Firefox on mobile complete garbage security wise? Genuinely curious. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] capacitor@reddthat.com 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) According to the GrapheneOS docs Firefox does not have internal sandboxing on Android. Apparently Firefox's sandbox is still substantially weaker than chromium and it is currently much more vulnerable to exploitation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] d3vnu1l@programming.dev 1 point 3 years ago Oh that's right. I read the same thing some time ago and had completely forgotten. Thanks for bringing it up. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] d3vnu1l@programming.dev 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) What makes Firefox on mobile complete garbage security wise? Genuinely curious. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] capacitor@reddthat.com 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) According to the GrapheneOS docs Firefox does not have internal sandboxing on Android. Apparently Firefox's sandbox is still substantially weaker than chromium and it is currently much more vulnerable to exploitation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] d3vnu1l@programming.dev 1 point 3 years ago Oh that's right. I read the same thing some time ago and had completely forgotten. Thanks for bringing it up. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] capacitor@reddthat.com 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) According to the GrapheneOS docs Firefox does not have internal sandboxing on Android. Apparently Firefox's sandbox is still substantially weaker than chromium and it is currently much more vulnerable to exploitation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] d3vnu1l@programming.dev 1 point 3 years ago Oh that's right. I read the same thing some time ago and had completely forgotten. Thanks for bringing it up. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] d3vnu1l@programming.dev 1 point 3 years ago Oh that's right. I read the same thing some time ago and had completely forgotten. Thanks for bringing it up. permalink fedilink source parent