▲ 347 ▼ Dataset confirms that a vegan diet is dramatically better across a range of environmental measures (phys.org) submitted 3 years ago by floofloof@lemmy.ca to c/science@lemmy.ml 147 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Vegoon@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/may/31/avoiding-meat-and-dairy-is-single-biggest-way-to-reduce-your-impact-on-earth permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 2 years ago (1 child) that fluff piece is misrepresenting the contents of the study permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Vegoon@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I am sure you did your own research on the shitter. Much smart, such proof, many scientific. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 2 years ago (1 child) you think i haven't seen the poore nemecek paper? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Vegoon@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I think you are just a egoistical self centered science denier who has troubles with very simple concepts. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) i think you don't understand science if you think the poore nemecek paper supports the fluff piece you referenced. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Vegoon@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Please, go on, rebut the IPCC https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aba7357 I am sure I will see it in the news, backyard science that changes how we see the world are always hyped. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 2 years ago this, also, does not support the fluff piece you linked. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 2 years ago (1 child) that fluff piece is misrepresenting the contents of the study permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Vegoon@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I am sure you did your own research on the shitter. Much smart, such proof, many scientific. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 2 years ago (1 child) you think i haven't seen the poore nemecek paper? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Vegoon@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I think you are just a egoistical self centered science denier who has troubles with very simple concepts. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) i think you don't understand science if you think the poore nemecek paper supports the fluff piece you referenced. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Vegoon@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Please, go on, rebut the IPCC https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aba7357 I am sure I will see it in the news, backyard science that changes how we see the world are always hyped. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 2 years ago this, also, does not support the fluff piece you linked. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Vegoon@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I am sure you did your own research on the shitter. Much smart, such proof, many scientific. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 2 years ago (1 child) you think i haven't seen the poore nemecek paper? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Vegoon@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I think you are just a egoistical self centered science denier who has troubles with very simple concepts. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) i think you don't understand science if you think the poore nemecek paper supports the fluff piece you referenced. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Vegoon@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Please, go on, rebut the IPCC https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aba7357 I am sure I will see it in the news, backyard science that changes how we see the world are always hyped. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 2 years ago this, also, does not support the fluff piece you linked. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 2 years ago (1 child) you think i haven't seen the poore nemecek paper? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Vegoon@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I think you are just a egoistical self centered science denier who has troubles with very simple concepts. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) i think you don't understand science if you think the poore nemecek paper supports the fluff piece you referenced. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Vegoon@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Please, go on, rebut the IPCC https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aba7357 I am sure I will see it in the news, backyard science that changes how we see the world are always hyped. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 2 years ago this, also, does not support the fluff piece you linked. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Vegoon@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I think you are just a egoistical self centered science denier who has troubles with very simple concepts. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) i think you don't understand science if you think the poore nemecek paper supports the fluff piece you referenced. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Vegoon@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Please, go on, rebut the IPCC https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aba7357 I am sure I will see it in the news, backyard science that changes how we see the world are always hyped. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 2 years ago this, also, does not support the fluff piece you linked. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) i think you don't understand science if you think the poore nemecek paper supports the fluff piece you referenced. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Vegoon@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Please, go on, rebut the IPCC https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aba7357 I am sure I will see it in the news, backyard science that changes how we see the world are always hyped. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 2 years ago this, also, does not support the fluff piece you linked. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Vegoon@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Please, go on, rebut the IPCC https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aba7357 I am sure I will see it in the news, backyard science that changes how we see the world are always hyped. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 2 years ago this, also, does not support the fluff piece you linked. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 2 years ago this, also, does not support the fluff piece you linked. permalink fedilink source parent