Linux

18,666 readers

2,224 active

52 users here now

Welcome to c/linux!

Welcome to our thriving Linux community! Whether you're a seasoned Linux enthusiast or just starting your journey, we're excited to have you here. Explore, learn, and collaborate with like-minded individuals who share a passion for open-source software and the endless possibilities it offers. Together, let's dive into the world of Linux and embrace the power of freedom, customization, and innovation. Enjoy your stay and feel free to join the vibrant discussions that await you!

Rules:

Stay on topic: Posts and discussions should be related to Linux, open source software, and related technologies.
Be respectful: Treat fellow community members with respect and courtesy.
Quality over quantity: Share informative and thought-provoking content.
No spam or self-promotion: Avoid excessive self-promotion or spamming.
No NSFW adult content
Follow general lemmy guidelines.

founded 3 years ago

moderators

MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world

What's everyone's favourite Linux rescue USB? (lemmy.world)

submitted 3 years ago by AlpacaChariot@lemmy.world to c/linux@lemmy.world

19 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Tell me your favourite rescue USB image and why!

Also rescue tips and tricks as that's always interesting.

I have been using a Debian installer USB as I had it to hand (DVD image IIRC) but if I boot into a shell without mounting another root FS the number of utilities is quite limited (just busybox basics). For example just now I wanted gzip but it only had gunzip...

I feel like a shell started from the installer USB should have access to a lot more utilities because the files are there on the disk!

Does anyone know a way to set up a kind of USB like the debian installer where you can install packages from the installer into the live environment?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] AlpacaChariot@lemmy.world [S] 2 points 3 years ago (1 child)

Slower than the kind of shell you get in the Debian installer?

Is it slower because it's trying to log and write to the root fs whereas the installer runs everything in RAM and doesn't write to the USB?

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] taipan_snake@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago

Yeah I think so. There are some optimisations that can be done to improve things, but at the end of the day it's running off a slow USB drive

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

lemmy:	0.19.20
mlmym (mschae):	26.3.4