you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 33 points 2 years ago (3 children)

The suspect in the car was known to have at least one pistol with a suppressor. That being said, the guy was given a cursory pat-down and could not have had a suppressed firearm on him unless it was in him.

A properly setup suppressed pistol fired from within a vehicle would be fairly quiet, but would sound nothing like an acorn bouncing off a car and you would know if you were hit.

He has no business being a cop if he freaks out when an acorn bounces off a car and taps his vest. Luckily the suspect was not physically harmed and the cop resigned. Hopefully the suspect gets a nice payout from the city.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    I think I read that the noise reduction from a suppressor is actually pretty minimal, and it's still in the same "incredibly painfully loud" ballpark as a regular gunshot

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Depends. As long as the bullet doesn't break the sound barrier, a gun can be made reasonably silent with a good suppressor, to the point where the sound of the semi-automatic mechanism operating is louder than the gunshot itself. If the bullet is supersonic, then it will still be painfully loud.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    A properly setup suppressed pistol fired from within a vehicle would be fairly quiet

    A Glock 17 9mm pistol is 162 db, with a suppressor it is 126 db. That's roughly as loud as a jackhammer. Not exactly what I'd call quiet.

  • source
  • parent