427
You’re a Cyclist Who Was Just Struck by a Car Driver. Here’s Why It Was Your Fault (www.mcsweeneys.net)
submitted 3 years ago by to c/fuck_cars@lemmy.ml
96 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

McSweeney's bringing some hard truths with this one. We could all be doing better.

You forgot to go back in time and tell people that subsidizing the oil industry might be a bad idea.
When the oil and auto industries teamed up to bend public policy to their will, making a system of roads and parking lots that now function as a continuous subsidy and magnificent symbol of the normalization of injury and pollution, you had a lot of options. You could have objected. You could have shifted public opinion. Instead, you weren’t even born yet. And, rather than go back in time, all you’ve been doing is riding to get groceries and occasionally saying, “Please stop killing us.” On the effort scale? 1/10.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 3 years ago (1 child)

Well, luckily this time they didn't. And I do know this is the anti-car sub and I'm not trying to be anti-bike at all. But there as a pedestrian from my expirence, I'd like to see numberplates on bikes.

Like on the same intersection, if there is a truck stopped and I cross, I'll stop and check the bike lane .. because I don't trust the red light with them.

I’m sorry that you have such horrible cyclists on your area.

But it's not just here. Even back in Germany I had trouble with it. Maybe I'm being a Bünzli, but there was a mixed predestian/cyclist lane and in Germany you have 2 very similar signs that designate how the lanes are used. If there is a horinzal line between the predestian and cylist, it's mixed. If the line is vertical, there are 2 separately marked pathes for each lane. Couldn't be easier, right?

Well, the city decided to pave the of this "mixed lane" with two different colours of bricks that basically painted two lanes. A reddish one and a usual, "stone coloured" one. Grey I guess. Anyway.

At more than one occation I was just walking by with a couple of people on this path, that basically is just randomly coloured for no reason ... when a cyclist speeds by, yelling that we're blocking that bike path.

And they are gone to fast, so you can't even yell back "there is no bike path, learn to read the fucking traffic signs".

Another problem might be that there really is no mandatory traffic education when buying a bike. Everyone just get's to have one. That might not be that smart in the long run.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Absolutely, and I'm not trying to minimize your frustrations with cyclists either. I've been hit by cyclists numerous times, thankfully I'm big, so it normally just ends up with a confused cyclists on the pavement. Someone smaller than we would not be so lucky.

    My observations on cycling design are :

    1. The wider the cycle lane, the less dangerous and fewer conflicts their are.

    2. It should be easier for the cyclists to transfer to car traffic and back than pediatrician traffic. This way a cyclist deciding to pass has to make a decision that could hurt themselves rather than someone else.

    3. Like a vehicle hitting a ped/cyc is always the cars fault, a cyc hitting a ped is always the bicycles fault.

    When I say bicycle there, I'm referring to all the wheeled dangers.

    The biggest upside I see it that people are oblivious assholes in cars or on bicycles, so at least bikes are slightly safer. Now that I think of it, there are oblivious assholes pedestrians too, I'm talking to you group of 6 walking abreast the entire sidewalk!

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •