you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 79 points 3 years ago (1 child)

We also didn't threaten to kill the farmers for growing it. No shit the Taliban was successful. Comply or die. They're the ones who were profiting from it anyway. Now that they're in charge again, religion trumps financial needs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 41 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    I'm pretty sure the Talibans (not to defend them, mind you), were already cracking down on poppy farming before 9/11 and the subsequent decade long war.

    So how were they benefitting? Or do you mean to say the US and allied forces allowed mass poppy crop farming that was then utilized by the Taliban to fund itself? You know there is an alternative hypothesis: the US and other occupation allied forces tolerated poppy farming to pacify and win over tribal chiefs and keep corrupt Afghan officials squarely on their side. Maybe both were happening, who is to say.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (3 children)

    Financed their war effort. We valued the whole hearts and minds over destroying farmers livelihood.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 41 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    winning the hearts and minds of the people we brutally conquered and ruled over for 20 years

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (1 child)

    Quite a few would disagree with that view, giving how many fled their own country when the Taliban took over again. But hey, don't let that narrative ruin your perspective. Lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 3 years ago

    Of course people who cooperate with occupiers usually want out when the occupation ends. They don't want to face the consequences of selling out their country.

    And of course "when people leave a Bad Country it's for political reasons, when they leave a Good Country it's for economic reasons" applies.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 39 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Lol, winning hearts and minds by protecting child rapists

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Average soldier wanted to deal with that. It was high command keeping that shit going because they wanted to keep tribal leaders happy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 40 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    That's even worse? Your senior officers are supposed to be the ones doing the right thing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments