▲ 406 ▼ Ethiopia becomes first country to ban internal combustion engines: Only EVs allowed (www.notebookcheck.net) submitted 2 years ago by fne8w2ah@lemmy.world to c/upliftingnews@lemmy.world 43 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] schnokobaer@lemmy.ml 33 points 2 years ago (1 child) That's even better than all cars being EVs. Rare W permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Poverty is the solution to climate change! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) It kind of is. The larger your income, the larger your carbon footprint, and that scales indefinitely. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) Not quite. The larger your consumption, the larger your carbon footprint. Just because a person is rich doesn't mean they have to have a private jet. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago* It's a generalization, but it's pretty reliable. Of course there are always exceptions. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Poverty is the solution to climate change! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) It kind of is. The larger your income, the larger your carbon footprint, and that scales indefinitely. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) Not quite. The larger your consumption, the larger your carbon footprint. Just because a person is rich doesn't mean they have to have a private jet. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago* It's a generalization, but it's pretty reliable. Of course there are always exceptions. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) It kind of is. The larger your income, the larger your carbon footprint, and that scales indefinitely. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) Not quite. The larger your consumption, the larger your carbon footprint. Just because a person is rich doesn't mean they have to have a private jet. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago* It's a generalization, but it's pretty reliable. Of course there are always exceptions. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) Not quite. The larger your consumption, the larger your carbon footprint. Just because a person is rich doesn't mean they have to have a private jet. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago* It's a generalization, but it's pretty reliable. Of course there are always exceptions. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago* It's a generalization, but it's pretty reliable. Of course there are always exceptions. permalink fedilink source parent