you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 120 points 3 years ago (4 children)

only fair enough, I remember when they made the US and UK do this after killing hundreds of thousands of people in Iraq

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 3 years ago (5 children)

    You're not wrong, but just because the USA and UK got away with it doesn't mean we should continue to let others get away with it. We can't go back in time and fix it but we've got to start somewhere.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 57 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    it's just a coincidence that this stuff only ever starts with our state enemies huh? only the bad countries get sanctioned for doing the same things we/our allies do. only Russia has to compete with neutral flags. only African leaders get prosecuted in the ICC.

    it's all nonsense used to manufacture consent for war and military spending

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 3 years ago* (2 children)

    Russia competes with neutral flags because they can't stop doping. It has nothing to do with us vs them. They literally can't stop cheating.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 41 points 3 years ago (17 children)

    Why are we letting the people responsible for Iraq and Afghanistans current state get away with it? Like if the US wants to arrest a war criminal Bush and Cheney are right there. Same for Blair, or Harper, or any of the other architects of the invasions.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 40 points 3 years ago*

    Because bourgeoisie law does three things. Firstly it protects capital against individuals. Secondly it protects itself against individuals so it can maintain "order". Finally, it prevents capital against itself, to prevent it devouring itself in competition or sucking hard enough to create a revolutionary populace. Protecting individuals against each other or against capital is not the purpose of law enforcement, much less protecting people from war criminals. (Btw if anyone can find the parenti lecture this was based off, please tell me because i forget)

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (16 replies)
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    "Just because we let the world's most prolific serial killer get away with it doesnt mean he shouldnt be allowed to keep murdering if he pinky swears his victims really deserve it this time."

    We can't go back in time and fix it but we've got to start somewhere.

    We are in total agreement here, and we can start by seizing the levers of power, purging the government of capitalists, withdrawing all troops from everywhere and using them for reforestation work, dismantling the IMF, paying reparations to every country we've victimized, and putting every fossil fuel executive and lobbyist against the wall for their omnicidal crimes against all terrestrial life.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)