In China, you can't exist without a smartphone, because for all existential things you have to do (paying bills, buying tickets etc.) , you are forced to use the almighty wechat app. Smartphones are a tool to manipulate and to spy on the population. It is a tool utilized by the ruling class, to control the masses. I hate the future and I hate "progress".

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 60 points 3 years ago (4 children)

The thing that is bothering me right now is seeing “cashless” establishments. Frankly, it’s kind of discriminatory, and I do not know how you can justify denying people goods and services if they are carrying the currency of the country they live in. That does not sit right with me.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Is it even legal to be cashless? What happened to “this note is legal tender for all debts, public and private"?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    What happened to “this note is legal tender for all debts, public and private"?

    The key word is debts. When you want to buy something in a store, you owe money if you want it, but you have not incurred a debt. You can just not buy it. You and the seller start at an even place, trade goods/services for money, and end even. If you have a debt, you're starting the transaction at a negative place and are trying to get back to even.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    If one were to consume the product before getting to the register, is it then considered a debt? Asking for a friend that is going to get some beer.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -17 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    If it's a private business then that's their choice. It's your choice to not give them your $. I don't see how that's discrimination? If they have something that you really want, then you'll choose a cashless option.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] 19 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)
  • [–] 7 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    I can’t take you to civil court if I’m claiming you won't pay for something as you stand there waving the money in front of my face.

    On this front. If you owe them money, they must accept cash. This is why people can pay thousands of pennies at tow yards. Or if you eat at a restaurant and they bring the bill, they can't then say they'll only take card, they must accept the cash.

    Physical money is "...legal tender for all debts, public charges, taxes, and dues." Notice that purchases/private charges or trades are not included in that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (1 child)

    How many have debit cards though?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 11 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago* (1 child)

    Wow, that's pretty crazy to think that so many people can't/won't get a bank account. Are these people undocumented immigrants with no identification? Is this the same part of the population that is targeted by the ID laws for voting?

    How are those people getting money? Is it really possible in the USA to just be paid with an envelope of cash? Or is it under the table work? Or if they are poor, is there any kind of benefit/welfare from the government? Don't they need a bank account to receive those funds?

    I'm just asking because in my country, I was able to open a bank account for free. I've had it for a year and I've never even deposited any money into it. But I have a debit card for that account. It seems impossible to me to have no access to a bank account. Even if you're homeless, you're still able to use your town hall as a contact address for official things.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Mom and Pop store shouldn't be forced to pay for a cash register and a safe. Nor face an increase possibility of robbery looking for cash.

    Now, instead of homeless hanging out by the entrance/exit begging for change, they can hang out and beg a customer to take their $2 cash to buy them water.

    They're not being banned from buying something they might need. They just need to be more creative.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 8 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)
  • [–] -4 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Of course you don't like an example that goes against your bs narrative.

    Many places around the globe have been moving toward cashless purchasing. Hell, you can walk into some Whole Foods and walk out without any type of transaction. If you don't think that level of interaction will become more wide spread... you seriously need to pull your head out of the sand.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 4 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)
  • [–] -1 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Bottom line is IMO it certainly isn't discrimination. Homeless person with enough cash for a bottle of water that only has a cashless option can try to exchange their cash for someone to make the purchase. Now, if they have a hard time finding someone, you could argue that individual people that won't help are being discriminatory.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    "It isn't that we built a system that specifically punishes and prohibits the poor and homeless. It's those darned lazy people who won't jump through the hurdles we installed to help them."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Get lost. Many social support systems use pre-loaded cards for all kinds of different benefits.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago

    Sorry, I thought the homeless were just supposed to beg people to be able to use the default currency of the United States.

    Ya know, the point you made in the previous comment that was what I was responding to.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 4 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)
  • [–] -1 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Correct. I won't. But, that puts the onus on the fellow customers v. business. Isn't free market ideas grand? BTW: people should never give homeless/beggars any cash. Could be a death sentence when they buy their next fix and OD.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 15 points 3 years ago

    Homeless people usually only have cash. The kinds of places that are cashless usually don't have goods at prices a homeless person would be purchasing something at but you can see how it's a concerning trend. And I'm sure privacy minded individuals would prefer to use cash when possible

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago*

    Alright, everything you said makes sense. That might even be how it is supposed to work. But I don't like it regardless that legal tender won't be accepted by a merchant. It feels like a corporation having a chokehold on what you buy and from where, and instant knowledge of people's spending habits.

  • source
  • parent