you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 16 points 2 years ago (1 child)

Yeah, you're just someone who doesn't know what they're talking about well enough to back it up.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -19 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Now who's making claims without evidence?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Well, I can state an opinion without evidence. Mine is based on your comments above. What you're claiming doesn't fall under the category of an opinion.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -16 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

    That's right they are not opinions. And you could verify them easily.

    Although it was 12 people, not thirteen, and only 9 of them were fired, as two were dead. Not sure of the twelfth.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    "Just google it bro" is the last resort of people with no confidence in their own statements.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -12 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    And "I refuse to do even basic research needed in order to have a valid opinion" is the last resort of people with lots of confidence in their own feelings.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    Still want to double down on that "irrefutable evidence"? Because it seems pretty refutable to me.

    Here's a relevant story before you claim once again that everyone who disagrees with you hasn't done any research. I know I'm not your dad or anything, but I'm willing to make this selfless offer for your benefit.

    Edit: just noticed this source was already provided at the very start of this thread. In other words, your entire argument was bullshit from the jump. Good to know.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments