All smartphones, including iPhones, must have replaceable batteries by 2027 in the EU::undefined

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 10 points 3 years ago (4 children)

Definitely. Never understood why some manufacturers removed jacks

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    I personally prefer my bluetooth headphones, but it's not like bluetooth and jacks can't exist on the same device..

    Plus, pairing bluetooth in a car can be annoying as fuck. Looking at you, Nissan

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] 7 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    BT pairing in our Ram works fine, and it works fine with the aftermarket Pioneer radio in my car. I've never had a major issue with either one with any phone I've owned, iPhone or Android.

    For our Mazda, though, BT pairing does not work reliably with my Samsung S21 - it's okay for phone calls (in fact, the car "steals" my calls if I'm on the phone at home and my wife gets home with the car), but for music it almost never works correctly, unless I'm also using Android Auto, which is rare because I just don't need it for most day-to-day drives. The BT phone and music works fine for my wife's iPhone, though.

    I blame the car - my phone works just fine with several sets of Bluetooth headsets, and the other two car stereos. I think Mazda just didn't bother to do any debugging before they shipped that piece of shit to the dealers. (This theory is based on other bugs we've found in the infotainment system as well.)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Yeah, they could coexist. I'm partial to non-bluetooth, but only because they come in shapes that I find more comfortable, and I've yet to find bluetooth ones that don't make my ears hurt

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -23 points 3 years ago (5 children)

    Headphone jacks are a 19th century invention, if having them restricts innovation then I am all for removing them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    We can't only consider innovation today, we also have to consider its ecological impact. Jack plugs and headphones are way more durable than Bluetooth equivalent. I have 16 yo jack headset that still works perfectly, I only had to change the cushions twice.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    It's specifically the wire that always breaks first. How can they be more durable?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 3 years ago*

    You can repair a broken cable fairly easily.

    When you buy wireless headphones you know upfront that they will die within a few years and you will not be able to replace the tiny glued in, oddly shaped batteries they come with.

    I like the convenience of BT at times, but I really miss having headphone jacks and hate having to bring adaptors with me.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    If you can financially, buy (second-hand) higher-end material, it will come with stronger wires and stronger connections.
    For example, see the difference in the constraints damper on these connectors:

    vs Apple's:

    Jack being simple technology, it's also very easy to get it repaired by the nearby tech enthusiast armed with a soldering iron.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    So stop making any technological advancement because of the potential impact of e-waste? Not saying it’s a bad thing but it will have have its own environmental implications. No new energy development, we have to rely on existing oil and nuclear technology rather than investing in making renewable energy sources cheaper and more efficient.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago*

    It's not an either-or situation, we can do both at the same time, we just have to consider environmental impact as an essential component of innovation.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    At the point we are at, yes we have to make a major change, e-waste is an immense problem for many years and we are only starting to fight it.

    Inventions not thinking about e-waste at all shouldn't be allowed anymore.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    So are speakers and batteries.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    True, but we don’t have any practical alternatives for them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    What's the practical alternative to headphone jacks? Bluetooth is crap and carrying around extra dongles is annoying.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    Bluetooth headphones are more practical due to not having wires. Jack is better for latency.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago*

    Practical for some scenarios, but impractical in others. A headphone jack also offers better sound quality overall and a less flaky connection, with no audio cutouts. It's not just latency, it's a superior and more reliable way to transmit high quality audio. And there's no battery to worry about charging. And a standard set of wired headphones can last for DECADES while a Bluetooth headset will start to die in about five years or less because the battery is non-replaceable lithium-ion. And there's no concern about whether your wired headphones are optimized for Android or iPhone, it's a standardized connector with an identical experience on both. And there's no issue with wireless interference on the 2.4GHz band that Bluetooth operates on.

    I can come up with more if you want.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Technically 20th century, if I'm not mistaken? I just don't see how they would restrict innovation, I guess

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Apparently it’s based on a plug invented in 1878, according to the BBC.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments