▲ 595 ▼ Apple Vision Pro Owners Are Struggling to Figure Out What They Just Bought (nymag.com) submitted 2 years ago by psychothumbs@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world 274 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] double_oh_walter@feddit.nu 7 points 2 years ago (2 children) Two dingi don’t make a right. Or something. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] vexikron@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Dingi. Pronounced ding eye? Dingii? Ding gee eye? My brain hurts now. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) It rhymes with dinghy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] vexikron@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) But thats just a single dinghy. If you pluralize that its either dinghies or dingii? Meh, my autistic brain gets stuck on weird stupid shit like this. Its like... If you have a donut, then a second donut, you have two donuts. You can say two donut to be cutesy i guess? Very hard for me to tell when being cutesy is appropriate. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) One dingus, two dingi. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] vexikron@lemmy.zip 1 point 2 years ago If the root singular word is dingus, this makes sense. If the root singular word is dinghy, as I guess I have always said, then it does not. Well at least I partially understand my own confusion now, thanks! permalink fedilink source parent [–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago (3 children) Don't they cancel each other out? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) Unfortunately they multiply instead of cancel permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world -5 points 2 years ago (1 child) One times one is still one permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] tofubl@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 years ago* (1 child) i times i is -1, though. Imagine that! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] darkecho@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago That's too complex for me. permalink fedilink source parent [–] double_oh_walter@feddit.nu 3 points 2 years ago Hmm. They might. Hadn’t thought of that. This requires more research. You must buy one - for science! And, I guess, for “science “. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ripcord@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (1 child) No, if you touch two dingii together you still have two dingii. Two sexy, sexy dingii permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world -6 points 2 years ago Now the singular is "dingius?" permalink fedilink source parent
[–] vexikron@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Dingi. Pronounced ding eye? Dingii? Ding gee eye? My brain hurts now. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) It rhymes with dinghy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] vexikron@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) But thats just a single dinghy. If you pluralize that its either dinghies or dingii? Meh, my autistic brain gets stuck on weird stupid shit like this. Its like... If you have a donut, then a second donut, you have two donuts. You can say two donut to be cutesy i guess? Very hard for me to tell when being cutesy is appropriate. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) One dingus, two dingi. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] vexikron@lemmy.zip 1 point 2 years ago If the root singular word is dingus, this makes sense. If the root singular word is dinghy, as I guess I have always said, then it does not. Well at least I partially understand my own confusion now, thanks! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) It rhymes with dinghy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] vexikron@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) But thats just a single dinghy. If you pluralize that its either dinghies or dingii? Meh, my autistic brain gets stuck on weird stupid shit like this. Its like... If you have a donut, then a second donut, you have two donuts. You can say two donut to be cutesy i guess? Very hard for me to tell when being cutesy is appropriate. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) One dingus, two dingi. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] vexikron@lemmy.zip 1 point 2 years ago If the root singular word is dingus, this makes sense. If the root singular word is dinghy, as I guess I have always said, then it does not. Well at least I partially understand my own confusion now, thanks! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] vexikron@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) But thats just a single dinghy. If you pluralize that its either dinghies or dingii? Meh, my autistic brain gets stuck on weird stupid shit like this. Its like... If you have a donut, then a second donut, you have two donuts. You can say two donut to be cutesy i guess? Very hard for me to tell when being cutesy is appropriate. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) One dingus, two dingi. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] vexikron@lemmy.zip 1 point 2 years ago If the root singular word is dingus, this makes sense. If the root singular word is dinghy, as I guess I have always said, then it does not. Well at least I partially understand my own confusion now, thanks! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) One dingus, two dingi. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] vexikron@lemmy.zip 1 point 2 years ago If the root singular word is dingus, this makes sense. If the root singular word is dinghy, as I guess I have always said, then it does not. Well at least I partially understand my own confusion now, thanks! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] vexikron@lemmy.zip 1 point 2 years ago If the root singular word is dingus, this makes sense. If the root singular word is dinghy, as I guess I have always said, then it does not. Well at least I partially understand my own confusion now, thanks! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago (3 children) Don't they cancel each other out? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) Unfortunately they multiply instead of cancel permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world -5 points 2 years ago (1 child) One times one is still one permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] tofubl@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 years ago* (1 child) i times i is -1, though. Imagine that! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] darkecho@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago That's too complex for me. permalink fedilink source parent [–] double_oh_walter@feddit.nu 3 points 2 years ago Hmm. They might. Hadn’t thought of that. This requires more research. You must buy one - for science! And, I guess, for “science “. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ripcord@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (1 child) No, if you touch two dingii together you still have two dingii. Two sexy, sexy dingii permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world -6 points 2 years ago Now the singular is "dingius?" permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) Unfortunately they multiply instead of cancel permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world -5 points 2 years ago (1 child) One times one is still one permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] tofubl@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 years ago* (1 child) i times i is -1, though. Imagine that! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] darkecho@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago That's too complex for me. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world -5 points 2 years ago (1 child) One times one is still one permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] tofubl@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 years ago* (1 child) i times i is -1, though. Imagine that! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] darkecho@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago That's too complex for me. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] tofubl@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 years ago* (1 child) i times i is -1, though. Imagine that! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] darkecho@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago That's too complex for me. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] darkecho@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago That's too complex for me. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] double_oh_walter@feddit.nu 3 points 2 years ago Hmm. They might. Hadn’t thought of that. This requires more research. You must buy one - for science! And, I guess, for “science “. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (1 child) No, if you touch two dingii together you still have two dingii. Two sexy, sexy dingii permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world -6 points 2 years ago Now the singular is "dingius?" permalink fedilink source parent
[+] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world -6 points 2 years ago Now the singular is "dingius?" permalink fedilink source parent