Archive link to story here: https://archive.ph/HVNLH

Posted here because there is no community for Absolutely Infuriating (that I know of).

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 54 points 3 years ago (1 child)

When I read that news I was shocked too.

How possibly nobody tested with even animal blood?

Water and blood have different consistency and fluidity

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -38 points 3 years ago* (3 children)

    Why kill animals? It's not like menstrual products don't work. just keep buying the stuff that works more than others if the little difference between the testing fluids and blood are really existent.

    And it's not like the products would be better with blood testing. That's not how capitalism works. It needs to work good enough to be bought with the biggest profit margin possible. So using blood for testing just creates suffering for animals for no reason other than you can put "tested with animal blood" on the box. I wouldn't see that as a plus

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Who said to kill animals just for this purpose? That would be irresponsible and incredibly asshole

    The industry is already dumping too much animal blood as a waste, just take a small drop from something that otherwise goes in wastewater anyway

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -32 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    We need to stop using animals. Not extend it. I mean I really don't get what's so hard about testing if a product works on humans in the real scenario.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 2 years ago

    Because testing things in laboratories for healthcare requires stringent and rigorous controls. It's a lot easier to standardise animal blood than human blood, and as the comment above highlighted - animal blood is already a waste product, whereas human blood is highly valuable for directly saving lives.

    Arguing for less animal usage is a nobler cause, but this is not the fight to pick for it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Water is comparable to blood in very very few ways. Outside of cleaning purposes I don't want water where my blood is.

    Also menstrual fluid isn't water.

    I want you to taste test this hamburger for me, you're going to eat it 3 times a day 60 days a year, and you're eating the beta version, which is actually a slice of pizza. Enjoy your hamburgers!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I'm sitting between my hplc and gcms, if you think pH and acidity (both carefully controlled for by the body) have nothing to do with absorption you might have very little experience with lab sciences.

    It's about much more than viscosity, it's about evaporation rate, chemical balance, and yes some absorbency. I would say just using generic human blood isn't enough, the chemistry within the vagina is self regulated like no other part of the human body, it's kinda the key organ to life's continuance.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)