▲ 637 ▼ Nuclear fusion reaction releases almost twice the energy put in (www.newscientist.com) submitted 2 years ago by throwaway389430@lemmy.cafe to c/news@lemmy.world 344 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] aidan@lemmy.world 27 points 2 years ago (3 children) It's not efficient, a huge amount of it gets diffused or absorbed permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago (1 child) It doesn't need to be efficient. Capture all the light that hits earth for 5 minutes and that's the world energy demand for a year. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe 5 points 2 years ago (3 children) How would you store it though? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) solar george permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bingbong@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Solar Robert permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WalrusDragonOnABike@reddthat.com 1 point 2 years ago Stéphane Robert permalink fedilink source parent [–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago Black hole permalink fedilink source parent [–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago Usually In plants and algae. permalink fedilink source parent [–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago It’s not efficient, a huge amount of it gets diffused or absorbed The amount that's left over though is more than enough, especially with today panels which only convert a very small percentage of that remaining energy. As the panels improve even more they'll be a very large energy surplus, even with how much solar light actually gets through the atmosphere. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Furbag@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (2 children) Wow, you're right! We should just build a Dyson sphere around the sun. 100% efficiency achieved. What could possibly go wrong? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] GojuRyu@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) Did you understand the person you respond to as saying its inefficient because the sun shines in other directions than the array proposed? I'm pretty sure the person talked specifically about the beam from the array to earth being inefficient. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Furbag@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago I was joking, but apparently nobody picked up on my snarky sarcasm. Disregard. permalink fedilink source parent [–] aidan@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago Where did I say that? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago (1 child) It doesn't need to be efficient. Capture all the light that hits earth for 5 minutes and that's the world energy demand for a year. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe 5 points 2 years ago (3 children) How would you store it though? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) solar george permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bingbong@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Solar Robert permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WalrusDragonOnABike@reddthat.com 1 point 2 years ago Stéphane Robert permalink fedilink source parent [–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago Black hole permalink fedilink source parent [–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago Usually In plants and algae. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe 5 points 2 years ago (3 children) How would you store it though? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) solar george permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bingbong@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Solar Robert permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WalrusDragonOnABike@reddthat.com 1 point 2 years ago Stéphane Robert permalink fedilink source parent [–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago Black hole permalink fedilink source parent [–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago Usually In plants and algae. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) solar george permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bingbong@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Solar Robert permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WalrusDragonOnABike@reddthat.com 1 point 2 years ago Stéphane Robert permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bingbong@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Solar Robert permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WalrusDragonOnABike@reddthat.com 1 point 2 years ago Stéphane Robert permalink fedilink source parent
[–] WalrusDragonOnABike@reddthat.com 1 point 2 years ago Stéphane Robert permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago Usually In plants and algae. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago It’s not efficient, a huge amount of it gets diffused or absorbed The amount that's left over though is more than enough, especially with today panels which only convert a very small percentage of that remaining energy. As the panels improve even more they'll be a very large energy surplus, even with how much solar light actually gets through the atmosphere. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Furbag@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (2 children) Wow, you're right! We should just build a Dyson sphere around the sun. 100% efficiency achieved. What could possibly go wrong? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] GojuRyu@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) Did you understand the person you respond to as saying its inefficient because the sun shines in other directions than the array proposed? I'm pretty sure the person talked specifically about the beam from the array to earth being inefficient. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Furbag@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago I was joking, but apparently nobody picked up on my snarky sarcasm. Disregard. permalink fedilink source parent [–] aidan@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago Where did I say that? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] GojuRyu@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) Did you understand the person you respond to as saying its inefficient because the sun shines in other directions than the array proposed? I'm pretty sure the person talked specifically about the beam from the array to earth being inefficient. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Furbag@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago I was joking, but apparently nobody picked up on my snarky sarcasm. Disregard. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago I was joking, but apparently nobody picked up on my snarky sarcasm. Disregard. permalink fedilink source parent