you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 49 points 2 years ago

Absolutely. Also, the fact that the reactor was only running for a short time plays a part. Usually there is a significant energy cost in starting and stopping, which is offset by running for a long time. However, these reactors are not designed for continued running.

It's all a process of development, and even though the article is perhaps a little sensationalist, they're making good progress.

  • source
  • parent