you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 15 points 2 years ago (3 children)

When one says a publication is grossly misleading, it certainly implies the entire publication

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Often the author doesn't write he headline. Not sure it matters but most a bit of info.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    You're not wrong, but we also should stop excusing, normalizing, and accepting wildly exaggerated for sales purposes titles of articles.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Why have we accepted the standard of misleading headlines? "Oh well you didn't read the article, I guess you and 90% of eyeballs get to be fundamentally misinformed" is an unhinged take.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I never said a misleading headline was acceptable. I said the publication is not misleading and that it covers the criticisms dude up above was leveling.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments