▲ 1365 ▼ Don't let the corporations tell you otherwise (lemmy.ohaa.xyz) submitted 2 years ago by FQQD@lemmy.ohaa.xyz to c/memes@lemmy.world 331 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] mac@infosec.pub 3 points 2 years ago* (2 children) What field uses =/= to mean !=? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) It's a shorthand way of writing ≠ digitally without needing to know the alt code or where it is in your mobile devices keyboard permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mac@infosec.pub 2 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Yeah in programming we just use !=: !: NOT =: EQUAL permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Gladaed@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago It is not a composite expression but a single expression made up from 2 letters. And this is not a widespread notation. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Funkytom467@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) != isn't universal, i've mostly seen it used in programming. Otherwise ≠ is the symbol we use in maths and generally the more common one. =/= is just the worst rendition of ≠ for people that don't know how to write it or are too lazy to go find it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mac@infosec.pub 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Yeah =/= is honestly a little confusing. I know != isn't universal though, gotta start making sure to use ≠ instead permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] squidspinachfootball@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You're definite not wrong, I actually went to use "!=" first. But then thought if someone wasn't familiar with programming they might not get it, so I went with the "=/=" hoping it would make sense to more people. Forgot that we're on lemmy and the audience here would generally understand lol. Didn't know ≠ existed though, will probably use that from now on. Nice! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Arghblarg@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago Have you heard of our Lord and Saviour, APL? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) It's a shorthand way of writing ≠ digitally without needing to know the alt code or where it is in your mobile devices keyboard permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mac@infosec.pub 2 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Yeah in programming we just use !=: !: NOT =: EQUAL permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Gladaed@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago It is not a composite expression but a single expression made up from 2 letters. And this is not a widespread notation. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mac@infosec.pub 2 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Yeah in programming we just use !=: !: NOT =: EQUAL permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Gladaed@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago It is not a composite expression but a single expression made up from 2 letters. And this is not a widespread notation. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Gladaed@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago It is not a composite expression but a single expression made up from 2 letters. And this is not a widespread notation. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Funkytom467@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) != isn't universal, i've mostly seen it used in programming. Otherwise ≠ is the symbol we use in maths and generally the more common one. =/= is just the worst rendition of ≠ for people that don't know how to write it or are too lazy to go find it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mac@infosec.pub 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Yeah =/= is honestly a little confusing. I know != isn't universal though, gotta start making sure to use ≠ instead permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] squidspinachfootball@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You're definite not wrong, I actually went to use "!=" first. But then thought if someone wasn't familiar with programming they might not get it, so I went with the "=/=" hoping it would make sense to more people. Forgot that we're on lemmy and the audience here would generally understand lol. Didn't know ≠ existed though, will probably use that from now on. Nice! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Arghblarg@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago Have you heard of our Lord and Saviour, APL? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mac@infosec.pub 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Yeah =/= is honestly a little confusing. I know != isn't universal though, gotta start making sure to use ≠ instead permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] squidspinachfootball@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You're definite not wrong, I actually went to use "!=" first. But then thought if someone wasn't familiar with programming they might not get it, so I went with the "=/=" hoping it would make sense to more people. Forgot that we're on lemmy and the audience here would generally understand lol. Didn't know ≠ existed though, will probably use that from now on. Nice! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Arghblarg@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago Have you heard of our Lord and Saviour, APL? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] squidspinachfootball@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You're definite not wrong, I actually went to use "!=" first. But then thought if someone wasn't familiar with programming they might not get it, so I went with the "=/=" hoping it would make sense to more people. Forgot that we're on lemmy and the audience here would generally understand lol. Didn't know ≠ existed though, will probably use that from now on. Nice! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Arghblarg@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago Have you heard of our Lord and Saviour, APL? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Arghblarg@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago Have you heard of our Lord and Saviour, APL? permalink fedilink source parent