▲ 502 ▼ New Footage Shows Tesla On Autopilot Crashing Into Police Car After Alerting Driver 150 Times (www.carscoops.com) submitted 3 years ago by L4s@lemmy.world [M, B] to c/technology@lemmy.world 165 comments fedilink hide all child comments New Footage Shows Tesla On Autopilot Crashing Into Police Car After Alerting Driver 150 Times::Six officers who were injured in the crash are suing Tesla despite the fact that the driver was allegedly impaired
[+] Colorcodedresistor@lemm.ee 7 points 3 years ago* (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] limelight79@lemm.ee 9 points 3 years ago (1 child) I turned off the "lane assist" in our Mazda because it kept steering me back toward obstacles I was trying to avoid, like cyclists, oversized loads, potholes, etc. I don't know why anyone thought that was a good idea. But try buying a car without those features now...sigh. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Grabthar@lemmy.world 6 points 3 years ago (2 children) Use your turn signal to indicate your direction change and it won't do that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] doggle@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) If you're swerving to avoid a sudden obstacle you reasonably may not have the foresight or reaction to flip on a signal. The car still needs to not force you back on collision course. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Grabthar@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago That's a good point, and is probably why they designed it so that if you swerve hard, lane assist shuts off. It only nudges you back to the middle of the lane if you are gently drifting to a side, so it only works in situations where your turn signal can be used to avoid it. Or you can just disable it if you drive a BMW or otherwise can't use turn signals. permalink fedilink source parent [–] limelight79@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago Even moving over slightly in the lane to avoid a pothole triggers it; it doesn't seem like a turn signal should be necessary in that situation. Instead the situation seems to be that I'm seeing the pothole and altering the car's course gently to avoid it, and I get close to the line and it freaks out. I guess if I drove right up to the obstacle then swerved, it wouldn't do it...but I was always taught swerving was a last-resort thing, best to drive as smoothly as possible. (This was my dad's argument, and I said, "Uh, SOMEONE taught me to not swerve unless it was necessary..." (him). He laughed. permalink fedilink source parent [+] 30mag@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] limelight79@lemm.ee 9 points 3 years ago (1 child) I turned off the "lane assist" in our Mazda because it kept steering me back toward obstacles I was trying to avoid, like cyclists, oversized loads, potholes, etc. I don't know why anyone thought that was a good idea. But try buying a car without those features now...sigh. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Grabthar@lemmy.world 6 points 3 years ago (2 children) Use your turn signal to indicate your direction change and it won't do that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] doggle@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) If you're swerving to avoid a sudden obstacle you reasonably may not have the foresight or reaction to flip on a signal. The car still needs to not force you back on collision course. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Grabthar@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago That's a good point, and is probably why they designed it so that if you swerve hard, lane assist shuts off. It only nudges you back to the middle of the lane if you are gently drifting to a side, so it only works in situations where your turn signal can be used to avoid it. Or you can just disable it if you drive a BMW or otherwise can't use turn signals. permalink fedilink source parent [–] limelight79@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago Even moving over slightly in the lane to avoid a pothole triggers it; it doesn't seem like a turn signal should be necessary in that situation. Instead the situation seems to be that I'm seeing the pothole and altering the car's course gently to avoid it, and I get close to the line and it freaks out. I guess if I drove right up to the obstacle then swerved, it wouldn't do it...but I was always taught swerving was a last-resort thing, best to drive as smoothly as possible. (This was my dad's argument, and I said, "Uh, SOMEONE taught me to not swerve unless it was necessary..." (him). He laughed. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Grabthar@lemmy.world 6 points 3 years ago (2 children) Use your turn signal to indicate your direction change and it won't do that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] doggle@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) If you're swerving to avoid a sudden obstacle you reasonably may not have the foresight or reaction to flip on a signal. The car still needs to not force you back on collision course. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Grabthar@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago That's a good point, and is probably why they designed it so that if you swerve hard, lane assist shuts off. It only nudges you back to the middle of the lane if you are gently drifting to a side, so it only works in situations where your turn signal can be used to avoid it. Or you can just disable it if you drive a BMW or otherwise can't use turn signals. permalink fedilink source parent [–] limelight79@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago Even moving over slightly in the lane to avoid a pothole triggers it; it doesn't seem like a turn signal should be necessary in that situation. Instead the situation seems to be that I'm seeing the pothole and altering the car's course gently to avoid it, and I get close to the line and it freaks out. I guess if I drove right up to the obstacle then swerved, it wouldn't do it...but I was always taught swerving was a last-resort thing, best to drive as smoothly as possible. (This was my dad's argument, and I said, "Uh, SOMEONE taught me to not swerve unless it was necessary..." (him). He laughed. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] doggle@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) If you're swerving to avoid a sudden obstacle you reasonably may not have the foresight or reaction to flip on a signal. The car still needs to not force you back on collision course. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Grabthar@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago That's a good point, and is probably why they designed it so that if you swerve hard, lane assist shuts off. It only nudges you back to the middle of the lane if you are gently drifting to a side, so it only works in situations where your turn signal can be used to avoid it. Or you can just disable it if you drive a BMW or otherwise can't use turn signals. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Grabthar@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago That's a good point, and is probably why they designed it so that if you swerve hard, lane assist shuts off. It only nudges you back to the middle of the lane if you are gently drifting to a side, so it only works in situations where your turn signal can be used to avoid it. Or you can just disable it if you drive a BMW or otherwise can't use turn signals. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] limelight79@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago Even moving over slightly in the lane to avoid a pothole triggers it; it doesn't seem like a turn signal should be necessary in that situation. Instead the situation seems to be that I'm seeing the pothole and altering the car's course gently to avoid it, and I get close to the line and it freaks out. I guess if I drove right up to the obstacle then swerved, it wouldn't do it...but I was always taught swerving was a last-resort thing, best to drive as smoothly as possible. (This was my dad's argument, and I said, "Uh, SOMEONE taught me to not swerve unless it was necessary..." (him). He laughed. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] 30mag@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent