you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 74 points 3 years ago* (9 children)

Congress members get as many votes for war as they have draft-age family members. For each vote they cast, they must enlist 1 family member. Starting with their own children.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Given the low regard for their children and grandchildren they show when it comes to climate change, I doubt that would be an adequate deterrent.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 years ago

    Senators are (with few exceptions) extraordinarily wealthy. When climate change is destroying crops and making some areas uninhabitable, these senators' families will still be living very comfortably.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Most of their kids are 55+, they can’t enlist lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 years ago

    I see an obvious exploit with this: congress members enlisting family members who would rather vote 'No' just so they can get more votes for their own choice.

    You might think "nobody would enlist their child to fight a war that they're against" but I promise you, there are people like that.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago

    We basically had that a century ago, before the nobility moved behind the scenes and became the 1%

    Unqualified scions were sent to the battlefield to gain military merits, which was generally bad for everyone. I'm pretty sure it only really stopped after WWI, when the death toll from combat started getting ridiculous

  • source
  • parent