you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 10 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

COBOL has entered the chat

e: good for legacy employment though. A relative of mine is a Z80 programmer by trade, and he can effectively walk into a job because the talent pool is so small now. Granted - the wages are never great but never poor, and the role is maintenance and troubleshooting rather than being on the leading edge of development - but it's a job for life.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Every time I hear about COBOL I feel like I should try to learn it as a backup plan...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I'm in two minds about that. One the one hand, yes, of course - as all the original COBOL folks die off, the skills will be even rarer and thus worth more.

    On the other hand, if we keep propping up old shit, the businesses will keep relying on it and it'll be even more painful when they do eventually get forced to migrate off it.

    On the other other hand, we know it works, and we don't want to migrate everything into a series of Electron apps just because that's popular at the moment.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Let COBOL die, it's terrible.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    If it works, why would we want to go through the trouble of switching to another language that will also eventually be regarded as needing to be retired? There's decades of debugging and improvement done on their system, start over with a new system and all that work needs to be done again but with a programming language that's probably much more complex and that leaves the door open to more mistakes...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)