▲ 366 ▼ Cooking Up Contingency Plans (i.imgur.com) submitted 3 years ago by CerealNommer@ttrpg.network to c/rpgmemes@ttrpg.network 65 comments fedilink hide all child comments Since my polymorph meme has only garnered three downvotes so far I thought I'd offer a bit more controversial take, and see if I can manage to stir the pot a bit with this one.
[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 15 points 3 years ago (2 children) Oh this is advanced pedantry. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 6 points 3 years ago (1 child) Advanced Pedants and Portents 2 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Royal_Bitch_Pudding@ttrpg.network 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) It's not particularly pedantic to ignore the "from others" part permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 7 points 3 years ago (2 children) They're not ignoring it, they're focusing on the part that says they can siphon from others. It doesn't explicitly say they can only siphon from others. RAI obviously wouldn't allow it because hurting yourself to save yourself is ridiculous, they're trying to say that RAW isn't specific about this particular use case and therefore it's OK. Which is... A stretch at best. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Royal_Bitch_Pudding@ttrpg.network 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) It specifically makes a point of saying "can siphon life from others to heal your wounds". So, Self is a valid target for the damage. However, the heal doesn't occur because the target is not someone else. If self was valid for the siphon there would be no reason to include the "from others" rider permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) I knew I named this thread correctly. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Royal_Bitch_Pudding@ttrpg.network 1 point 3 years ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 0 points 3 years ago You're either high on drugs or high on a horse. In either case, I suggest you come back down. It was a reference to this. permalink fedilink source parent [–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 0 points 3 years ago You're either high on drugs or high on a horse. In either case, I suggest you come back down. It was a reference to this. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Kryomaani@sopuli.xyz -1 points 3 years ago It doesn’t explicitly say they can only siphon from others. And it doesn't explicitly say they cannot fly yet no sane person would infer that this spell makes you capable of flying. The spell does only what it says it does, otherwise you are still bound by all the base rules and limitations of the game, like not being able to willy-nilly siphon life force out of things without a feature that explicitly says you can. permalink fedilink source parent [–] CerealNommer@ttrpg.network [S] -1 points 3 years ago Yes, thank you. 👍 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 6 points 3 years ago (1 child) Advanced Pedants and Portents 2 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Royal_Bitch_Pudding@ttrpg.network 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) It's not particularly pedantic to ignore the "from others" part permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 7 points 3 years ago (2 children) They're not ignoring it, they're focusing on the part that says they can siphon from others. It doesn't explicitly say they can only siphon from others. RAI obviously wouldn't allow it because hurting yourself to save yourself is ridiculous, they're trying to say that RAW isn't specific about this particular use case and therefore it's OK. Which is... A stretch at best. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Royal_Bitch_Pudding@ttrpg.network 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) It specifically makes a point of saying "can siphon life from others to heal your wounds". So, Self is a valid target for the damage. However, the heal doesn't occur because the target is not someone else. If self was valid for the siphon there would be no reason to include the "from others" rider permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) I knew I named this thread correctly. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Royal_Bitch_Pudding@ttrpg.network 1 point 3 years ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 0 points 3 years ago You're either high on drugs or high on a horse. In either case, I suggest you come back down. It was a reference to this. permalink fedilink source parent [–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 0 points 3 years ago You're either high on drugs or high on a horse. In either case, I suggest you come back down. It was a reference to this. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Kryomaani@sopuli.xyz -1 points 3 years ago It doesn’t explicitly say they can only siphon from others. And it doesn't explicitly say they cannot fly yet no sane person would infer that this spell makes you capable of flying. The spell does only what it says it does, otherwise you are still bound by all the base rules and limitations of the game, like not being able to willy-nilly siphon life force out of things without a feature that explicitly says you can. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Royal_Bitch_Pudding@ttrpg.network 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) It's not particularly pedantic to ignore the "from others" part permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 7 points 3 years ago (2 children) They're not ignoring it, they're focusing on the part that says they can siphon from others. It doesn't explicitly say they can only siphon from others. RAI obviously wouldn't allow it because hurting yourself to save yourself is ridiculous, they're trying to say that RAW isn't specific about this particular use case and therefore it's OK. Which is... A stretch at best. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Royal_Bitch_Pudding@ttrpg.network 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) It specifically makes a point of saying "can siphon life from others to heal your wounds". So, Self is a valid target for the damage. However, the heal doesn't occur because the target is not someone else. If self was valid for the siphon there would be no reason to include the "from others" rider permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) I knew I named this thread correctly. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Royal_Bitch_Pudding@ttrpg.network 1 point 3 years ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 0 points 3 years ago You're either high on drugs or high on a horse. In either case, I suggest you come back down. It was a reference to this. permalink fedilink source parent [–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 0 points 3 years ago You're either high on drugs or high on a horse. In either case, I suggest you come back down. It was a reference to this. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Kryomaani@sopuli.xyz -1 points 3 years ago It doesn’t explicitly say they can only siphon from others. And it doesn't explicitly say they cannot fly yet no sane person would infer that this spell makes you capable of flying. The spell does only what it says it does, otherwise you are still bound by all the base rules and limitations of the game, like not being able to willy-nilly siphon life force out of things without a feature that explicitly says you can. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 7 points 3 years ago (2 children) They're not ignoring it, they're focusing on the part that says they can siphon from others. It doesn't explicitly say they can only siphon from others. RAI obviously wouldn't allow it because hurting yourself to save yourself is ridiculous, they're trying to say that RAW isn't specific about this particular use case and therefore it's OK. Which is... A stretch at best. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Royal_Bitch_Pudding@ttrpg.network 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) It specifically makes a point of saying "can siphon life from others to heal your wounds". So, Self is a valid target for the damage. However, the heal doesn't occur because the target is not someone else. If self was valid for the siphon there would be no reason to include the "from others" rider permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) I knew I named this thread correctly. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Royal_Bitch_Pudding@ttrpg.network 1 point 3 years ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 0 points 3 years ago You're either high on drugs or high on a horse. In either case, I suggest you come back down. It was a reference to this. permalink fedilink source parent [–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 0 points 3 years ago You're either high on drugs or high on a horse. In either case, I suggest you come back down. It was a reference to this. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Kryomaani@sopuli.xyz -1 points 3 years ago It doesn’t explicitly say they can only siphon from others. And it doesn't explicitly say they cannot fly yet no sane person would infer that this spell makes you capable of flying. The spell does only what it says it does, otherwise you are still bound by all the base rules and limitations of the game, like not being able to willy-nilly siphon life force out of things without a feature that explicitly says you can. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Royal_Bitch_Pudding@ttrpg.network 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) It specifically makes a point of saying "can siphon life from others to heal your wounds". So, Self is a valid target for the damage. However, the heal doesn't occur because the target is not someone else. If self was valid for the siphon there would be no reason to include the "from others" rider permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) I knew I named this thread correctly. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Royal_Bitch_Pudding@ttrpg.network 1 point 3 years ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 0 points 3 years ago You're either high on drugs or high on a horse. In either case, I suggest you come back down. It was a reference to this. permalink fedilink source parent [–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 0 points 3 years ago You're either high on drugs or high on a horse. In either case, I suggest you come back down. It was a reference to this. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) I knew I named this thread correctly. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Royal_Bitch_Pudding@ttrpg.network 1 point 3 years ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 0 points 3 years ago You're either high on drugs or high on a horse. In either case, I suggest you come back down. It was a reference to this. permalink fedilink source parent [–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 0 points 3 years ago You're either high on drugs or high on a horse. In either case, I suggest you come back down. It was a reference to this. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Royal_Bitch_Pudding@ttrpg.network 1 point 3 years ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 0 points 3 years ago You're either high on drugs or high on a horse. In either case, I suggest you come back down. It was a reference to this. permalink fedilink source parent [–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 0 points 3 years ago You're either high on drugs or high on a horse. In either case, I suggest you come back down. It was a reference to this. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 0 points 3 years ago You're either high on drugs or high on a horse. In either case, I suggest you come back down. It was a reference to this. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 0 points 3 years ago You're either high on drugs or high on a horse. In either case, I suggest you come back down. It was a reference to this. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Kryomaani@sopuli.xyz -1 points 3 years ago It doesn’t explicitly say they can only siphon from others. And it doesn't explicitly say they cannot fly yet no sane person would infer that this spell makes you capable of flying. The spell does only what it says it does, otherwise you are still bound by all the base rules and limitations of the game, like not being able to willy-nilly siphon life force out of things without a feature that explicitly says you can. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CerealNommer@ttrpg.network [S] -1 points 3 years ago Yes, thank you. 👍 permalink fedilink source parent