I hear a lot of people talk about how we need to look at religion from a materialist lens and that religion is incomparable with socialism. But I think we need to seperate the two. Religion is about the metaphysical so it's hard to look at it from a materialist lens. While politics deals with materialist matters, so it's necessary to view it with a materialist lens. And it's not like atheism is fully materialist either, with 'nothing after death', and 'universe starting without a god' being metaphysical explanations as well. And humans are naturally spiritual and to deny that, makes it harder for socialism to be accepted by people. But of course that doesn't mean we should tolerate the reactionary aspects of religion. We should combat it whenever necessary.

What's your opinion?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 6 points 3 years ago (1 child)

But there's also no proof that god doesn't exist, so the actual materialist thing to do is to be agnostic

Atheists are "agnostic". No one is saying "I'm certain god doesn't exist", we're saying "there's no evidence that one exists".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 3 years ago (1 child)

    In that case christians who are open to the idea of being wrong are also agnostic. You could use agnostic as an adjective to atheism, but I believe agnostic, as a noun, is the way to be truly materialist

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    christians who are open to the idea of being wrong

    Do those exist?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 3 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Not all of them, but some do.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    I feel like doubt is contrary to the whole idea of 'faith' but I'm not religious so what do I know.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments