▲ 1425 ▼ More Gen Z Americans identify as LGBTQ than as Republican (www.thepinknews.com) submitted 2 years ago by _number8_@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world 503 comments fedilink hide all child comments let's gooo
[–] CaptainProton@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago (2 children) But what will replace them? Uni-party doesn't work either (e.g. NYC) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] proudblond@lemmy.world 40 points 2 years ago Hopefully the Democrats. No seriously, I hope the Dems become our more conservative party and we get a more progressive party. But… I’m not holding my breath, honestly. Feels like wishful thinking. permalink fedilink source parent [–] frezik@midwest.social 8 points 2 years ago (2 children) A new party will pop up. The Federalist Party died out after Hamilton was shot and also the War of 1812. They fielded their last Presidential candidate in 1816 with 30.9% of the vote. Then the National Republican Party (different from the current Republican party) evolved out of the Democratic-Republican Party. Personally, I'd love it if Democrats became the right-most party by staying exactly as they are, and a new party breaks off of them or evolves out to their left. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] nybble41@programming.dev 3 points 2 years ago Personally, I'd love it if Democrats became the right-most party by staying exactly as they are, and a new party breaks off of them or evolves out to their left. I'd say it's more likely to go the other way, with the more moderate or right-leaning Democrats breaking off to form their own party and perhaps steal away the more moderate Republican voters. There are a lot of voters who would naturally align more closely with traditional Republican political views voting Democrat only because the Republican party has been taken over by a radical faction. Having laissez-faire fiscal conservatives and outright socialists in the same party isn't really sustainable long-term; there are too many critical points of disagreement. permalink fedilink source parent [–] CaptainProton@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Democrats aren't exactly a healthy representation of moderation. They're too authoritarian for me to want the other party to be the actually-socialist party. Socialist and libertarian would be a balance, but it requires a big chunk of the Democrat platform to burn alongside MAGA. Honestly actually-socialist and actually-libertarian would be the two parties we really need today. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Delta_V@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) actually-socialist and actually-libertarian would be the two parties we really need today they're the same party permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CaptainProton@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* Which one is that? I'm not sure you understand the difference if you think both can possibly be represented by the same party. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] proudblond@lemmy.world 40 points 2 years ago Hopefully the Democrats. No seriously, I hope the Dems become our more conservative party and we get a more progressive party. But… I’m not holding my breath, honestly. Feels like wishful thinking. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] frezik@midwest.social 8 points 2 years ago (2 children) A new party will pop up. The Federalist Party died out after Hamilton was shot and also the War of 1812. They fielded their last Presidential candidate in 1816 with 30.9% of the vote. Then the National Republican Party (different from the current Republican party) evolved out of the Democratic-Republican Party. Personally, I'd love it if Democrats became the right-most party by staying exactly as they are, and a new party breaks off of them or evolves out to their left. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] nybble41@programming.dev 3 points 2 years ago Personally, I'd love it if Democrats became the right-most party by staying exactly as they are, and a new party breaks off of them or evolves out to their left. I'd say it's more likely to go the other way, with the more moderate or right-leaning Democrats breaking off to form their own party and perhaps steal away the more moderate Republican voters. There are a lot of voters who would naturally align more closely with traditional Republican political views voting Democrat only because the Republican party has been taken over by a radical faction. Having laissez-faire fiscal conservatives and outright socialists in the same party isn't really sustainable long-term; there are too many critical points of disagreement. permalink fedilink source parent [–] CaptainProton@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Democrats aren't exactly a healthy representation of moderation. They're too authoritarian for me to want the other party to be the actually-socialist party. Socialist and libertarian would be a balance, but it requires a big chunk of the Democrat platform to burn alongside MAGA. Honestly actually-socialist and actually-libertarian would be the two parties we really need today. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Delta_V@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) actually-socialist and actually-libertarian would be the two parties we really need today they're the same party permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CaptainProton@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* Which one is that? I'm not sure you understand the difference if you think both can possibly be represented by the same party. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] nybble41@programming.dev 3 points 2 years ago Personally, I'd love it if Democrats became the right-most party by staying exactly as they are, and a new party breaks off of them or evolves out to their left. I'd say it's more likely to go the other way, with the more moderate or right-leaning Democrats breaking off to form their own party and perhaps steal away the more moderate Republican voters. There are a lot of voters who would naturally align more closely with traditional Republican political views voting Democrat only because the Republican party has been taken over by a radical faction. Having laissez-faire fiscal conservatives and outright socialists in the same party isn't really sustainable long-term; there are too many critical points of disagreement. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CaptainProton@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Democrats aren't exactly a healthy representation of moderation. They're too authoritarian for me to want the other party to be the actually-socialist party. Socialist and libertarian would be a balance, but it requires a big chunk of the Democrat platform to burn alongside MAGA. Honestly actually-socialist and actually-libertarian would be the two parties we really need today. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Delta_V@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) actually-socialist and actually-libertarian would be the two parties we really need today they're the same party permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CaptainProton@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* Which one is that? I'm not sure you understand the difference if you think both can possibly be represented by the same party. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Delta_V@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) actually-socialist and actually-libertarian would be the two parties we really need today they're the same party permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CaptainProton@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* Which one is that? I'm not sure you understand the difference if you think both can possibly be represented by the same party. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CaptainProton@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* Which one is that? I'm not sure you understand the difference if you think both can possibly be represented by the same party. permalink fedilink source parent