you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 20 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Ok, but Android wouldn't have to allow sideloading by that logic, yet...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Android is not a company though, it's FOSS. Google could ban it on their branch I suppose.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    Most Android components can technically be FOSS, but the it's monolythic nature makes it very hard to get from those FOSS benefits. Best example is TV using Android, phone using Android, but cannot change the interface without hacking half-baked thing like custom ROM.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Google does indeed use Google Play Services to gate-keep the Ecosystem while keeping Android technically FOSS. Still better than Apple in this case, but hey... would you rather be hanged or beheaded?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    So? Companies can and have removed features like that at the behest of some dickwad in power. Don't take anything for granted. We need to heavily regulate them. Or hell take games. Capcom is currently adding DRM to 12+year old games. Garbage like that should be forbidden by law instead of relying on shitstorms to get companies to comply.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments