you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (1 child)

These things are currently infamously bad at math, though.

I won't argue that it'll never get there. I'm confident it will, - though with a lot more perl hacks than elegant emergence.

But today, these things have an astonishingly high 'appearance of intelligence' to 'incredible stupidity' ratio.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Humans are also not particularly well known for their math skills. Ask a random stranger to do simple arithmetic in their head, with only a few seconds to think and no outside help, and I wouldn't expect particularly reliable results.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago

    however, people are not notoriously bad at the types of basic arithmetic they test for. every time I pay something with cash, I work out how much change I'm owed mentally, and so does the seller. I can count on one hand the number of times I've actually been given incorrect change throughout my entire lifetime. And when I did get wrong change, it was usually "oh, I thought you gave me €10 ínstead of €20". Meaning that they actually still did the math correctly.

    No sane person will ever tell you 4 is bigger than 7. Yet llms sometimes get even this type of question wrong. They learn patterns, but not concepts. This is even simpler than basic arithmetic.

  • source
  • parent