170
(UK) Medics should not report suspected illegal abortions to police, say doctors (news.sky.com)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/world@lemmy.world
8 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists will remind healthcare workers of their duty to maintain patient confidentiality in new guidance, which is yet to be published.

Medics should not report suspected cases of illegal abortion to the police, leading women's doctors are set to say.

The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) is expected to publish new guidance that it is "never" in the public interest to share information about suspected illegal abortions.

It comes after high-profile prosecutions, including that of Bethany Cox, who was accused of using poison for an at-home abortion in 2020.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 9 points 2 years ago (1 child)

that varies across the countries. where I live, a doctor must not reveal anything the patient has told them during a visit/medical procedure/etc., with the only exception being when there's a risk of a future harm. so a doctor can't report the patient has admitted to having murdered someone, but should report if they say they're about to.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    For the United States, it's not even just some risk of future harm. The standard is much stricter, it's if "a provider determines that there is a serious and imminent threat of a patient physically harming self or others." Has to be something very specific and imminent for confidentiality to be breached.

    There are a few more edge cases though, for instance doctors and other healthcare workers are usually mandatory reporters by law, so if they suspect child abuse they are legally obligated to report it. Another one is for infectious disease tracking and reporting, there may also be confidentiality exceptions.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago

    if "a provider determines that there is a serious and imminent threat of a patient physically harming self or others"

    yeah, pretty much the same, I'm just not that eloquent in English :P

    there's a similar clause with some infectious diseases if I remember correctly, and I'm honestly not sure how's the suspected child abuse handled, but probably the same.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent