914
Alex Jones is profiting from his new game on Steam — while refusing to pay the Sandy Hook families he defamed (www.mediamatters.org)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/politics@lemmy.world
268 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Following his trial for defamation of the families of the children and school staff killed in the Sandy Hook massacre, conspiracy theorist Alex Jones is using Valve Corp.’s Steam, the world’s largest digital distribution platform for PC games, to sell an Infowars-themed video game. Jones claims to have earned hundreds of thousands in revenue from the video game, yet he has refused to pay the Sandy Hook families. Alex Jones: NWO Wars also mirrors and cartoonishly repackages the conspiracy theorist’s regularly violent, hateful rhetoric despite the platform’s policies against hate speech.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

They interviewed a child that was taped to a table, huh?

No. Not that I'm aware of. Do you have more information?

You asked what I thought. I said it was nothing.

Are you certain it is nothing or is it probably nothing. If the former then I would like to know why.

Let's talk about the girl taped to a table. Does this girl have a name?

Yes. The question of interest is, do child services know her name?

Please post the instagram of this poor child taped to a table.

It's in the steemit summary linked above.

Can do you have a picture where she isn't smiling?

So it's not abuse if they enjoy it? Heard of normalisation?

All you've said about pizzagate, is that I don't know what pizzagate is.

I don't think I've said anything of the sort. You seem quite knowledgeable. However, if you are certain it has been debunked then you must be an expert.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    Since knock_knock is too demure to show graphic content here, I will share the photo. These are the words above the photo in the document

    Warning: some of these are pretty weird/sexual, probably best not to view at work

    We might as well start with this picture of a girl taped to a table, which is probably the most widely referenced one.

    spoiler

    THIS is the "most widely referenced" picture of all the pizzagate allegations. THIS is why it's like pulling teeth to get a pizzagater to make ONE real claim. The emperor has no clothes. They are so proud of a mountain of nothing.

    There is no one who is credibility alleged to have explicit material of this child. It is at this point where I am expected to appear to ask for this material. This could be a crime. Be careful. Look how fast this reply was locked-and-loaded.

    Can do you have a picture where she isn’t smiling?

    So it’s not abuse if they enjoy it? Heard of normalisation?

    If you think that question is void now due to that retort, you are mistaken. Anyone reading along can see the photo now. You really should have tried to get ahead of that. I bet no one was picturing masking tape with the picture you created in words.

    I have showed the only evidence provided that this child exists. Are there alleged to be other materials of this child that are objectionable? Is this a victim?

    Virginia Giuffre was a victim who came forward.

    Only as a middle aged woman. Kids in the Instagram photos would now barely be over 10. You can’t use their silence as evidence.

    "You can't use their silence as evidence." What? They sound exactly like nonexistent victims. There must be a difference between real victims and nonexistent victims. Silence is clearly not a good measurement. Are there any other methods to look for them?

    any pundit that “bunks” pizzagate talking-points that also said anything about Epstein

    Sorry. Not a claim or a point I’m defending.

    I know this isn't a claim. It's a point worth discussing. There are people in our society whose job is gain the trust of people by showing integrity. They are called journalists. A journalist knows that if a reader catches the whiff of dishonesty, they lose that reader permanently.

    So a journalist with a long, track-able career is who is best equipped to make such sensitive accusations. This is usually how rings would get busted. So who is putting their career on the line for this? Is Mike Cernovich the point-person on these matters? These accusations are dangerous. Your dismal of that is sickening, but I'll come back to that later.

    I’m not even sure what “claims of debunking” you even mean.

    It means the claimer is 100% sure that a particular theory is false

    This is the worst framing of epistemology I've seen. You are quite literally turning every argument in a "confidence game". Surely you see that the world can't function like that.

    But I will give you this, you finally connected the dots in a way that I see how pizzagate is real.

    We've had too many exchanges before I finally can see what pizzagate actually is.

    Pizzagate: The believe that real world damage can be caused simply by never admitting any harmless explanations regardless of plausibility.

    The fucked up thing here, is that with this formulation, Pizzagate is true.

    1.) The only thing that little girl's guardians did was upload a photo of the aftermath of child's play.

    2.) Now, 4chan enters the scene. 4chan and reddit simply make up ANYTHING they want to accuse these people of. Consequence free. There is no journalist in the loop. There are no stakes. You get federal authorities to harass strangers. And you are proud of it.

    3.) THEN this visit is now "evidence". You keep pointing to police action, like it's suspicious, but 4chan did that shit. I don't know who you are fooling, but it isn't me.

    These three dots are what you connected. You have convinced me it's real. It's scary. It's sick that people would do this.

    You can claim it's about protecting kids, but there have been no rescues or even calls for help.

    Here's from Wikipedia

    On December 4, 2016, Edgar Maddison Welch, a 28-year-old man from Salisbury, North Carolina, arrived at Comet Ping Pong and fired three shots from an AR-15 style rifle that struck the restaurant's walls, a desk, and a door.

    Welch was there to liberate victims. Who did he avenge? Who is lucky that Welch was there to listen to the cries of help that 4chan told him exist?

    I find this stuff dangerous, and it's usually best discussed in a more focused group.

    We are discussing 8 year old emails and Instagram posts. Not planning an insurrection.

    Three bullets are what I'm calling dangerous, sicko. You know what is happening. You know the bullets were real.

    You seem very proud that the feds were sent to investigate this. That seems to be a claim of victory. It's disturbing. There was no foundation. You just hate these people. It's unpleasant to say the least. You're proud you can imagine such horrible things happening. You don't even need proof. And you just want the world to hate these people like you do, and based on as flimsy shit as you accept as proof.

    I'm done here. Pizzagate sucks. You can come bother me at /c/knowledgefight.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (2 children)

    THIS is why it's like pulling teeth to get a pizzagater to make ONE real claim.

    I gave you 3 claims, and you picked your own 4th.

    It is at this point where I am expected to appear to ask for this material. This could be a crime. Be careful. Look how fast this reply was locked-and-loaded.

    Ah, now I see why you were so weirdly desperate for me to post that particular photo. You had a narrative needing to be fulfilled. Sorry to disappoint.

    Are there alleged to be other materials of this child that are objectionable?

    Yes, and they haven't been acted upon either.

    Is this a victim?

    Potentially, yes. How are you imagining this kid "coming forward" to the authorities?

    Silence is clearly not a good measurement. Are there any other methods to look for them?

    Yep. By photos posted online by their abusers. By having child services interview their guardians.

    Theses accusations are dangerous.

    And should have been handled by the police. They weren't.

    There is no one who is credibility alleged to have explicit material of this child.

    No-one claimed this either. Debunkers love to invent strawmen to attack.

    1.) The only thing that little girl's guardians did was upload a photo of the aftermath of child's play.

    Your favourite picture is far from the only suspicious Instagram post/comment

    You get federal authorities to harass strangers.

    Literally their job. And they point is they weren't doing it.

    sicko.

    You are the one defending the guy with a "members only" file share on his website who makes child abuse jokes on Instagram.

    based on as flimsy shit as you accept as proof.

    This applies equally to debunkers who think "no basement" is proof that pizzagate is false.

    I'm not convinced any part of pizzagate is real, but you (and other debunkers) are convinced it is 100% fake. That's what is interesting.

    Pizzagate debunkers are just as fervently irrational as the unquestioning gun toting believers.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    THIS is why it’s like pulling teeth to get a pizzagater to make ONE real claim.

    I gave you 3 claims, and you picked your own 4th.

    Would you like me to read one of those 3 claims?

    Instagram was used to joke about child abuse.

    So let's see we're YOU are finding this instagram stuff. Hmm..

    No, the. Best evidence is the steemit summary above. That made a LOT of people suspicious

    Ok, we know where your BEST evidence is. Let's figure out this instagram claim.

    Here are the times YOU brought up Instagram:

    At least the guardian’s of the kids in the Instagram photos should have been questioned.

    We are discussing 8 year old emails and Instagram posts.

    Virginia Giuffre was a victim who came forward.

    Only as a middle aged woman. Kids in the Instagram photos would now barely be over 10.

    There are no victims in pizzagate.

    We have photos of some from Instagram.

    That investigation went as far as it could before violating the rights of a private business owner

    No. There was no investigation (sorry, no supporting evidence). “Private business owner” has nothing to do with suggestive Instagram posts involving children.

    You talk a lot about instagram for someone who finds the FIRST instagram picture from your GOLDEN source embarrassing. Here, I'll add context. I'll expand the crop. And let see what this fear-mongering document says...

    It's the "most widely referenced one". YOU are the one pointing to internet "frenzies" as evidence. An internet frenzy was whipped up about this ONE picture in particular. There are no other pictures related to this child. YOU are claiming the other photos are connected.

    Adding more context makes the evidence look WORSE.

    Also notice that the simple explanation isn't good enough: "please let me know if there are more". They want another explanation because then "see, they're changing their story". For some reason they want the reader to be suspicious of only ONE explanation. Reality works in a strange way for people who think like this.

    Then every pizzagater ever says, "that's why you picked THAT photo. Of course the one my opponent chooses one that makes me look silly. They won't show you the other stuff I sent them. Please read the first paragraph at least, where it says if you don't see EVERYTHING, you'll be too ignorant to know the truth."

    They are always saying "look at everything. but don't look at anything."

    The only claim I made is that I have seen no proof of illegal activity. There are plenty of times in my life where I have seen proof of illegal activity. It's a pretty common thing to see on the news. I don't see why I should worry about people who have weird tastes in art. I see a lot of mixing pizza, weird art, and sex in that doc, but not kids. I'm worried about one who see that photo as normalization of child abuse. (Here is where that claim of "I'm not claiming THAT photo is what i'm talking about. don't you see how vague i'm being. look at everything" This is 30-Rock's "Homonym Game" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WZLkcFns8Ks )

    Seeing a girl smiling with masking tape on her arms does NOT look like normalization [i use US spelling]

    Can do you have a picture where she isn’t smiling?

    So it’s not abuse if they enjoy it? Heard of normalisation?

    You are either being very disingenuous here, or you find that image stirring. I do not want to accuse you of anything, but the reason I want a journalist in the loop is because every pizzagater with any sizable voice is WITHOUT FAIL either (a) trying to convince people (including themselves) that SA material of minors is more common than it is or (b) very homophobic.

    The document you provided is teeming with homophobia.

    I am implementing a new rule. I will not engage with pizzagate arguments with people unless they pledge: "There is a gay person in my life that I love, and they live a meaningful, fulfilling life." That's probably not hard. Honestly, I don't care if you know them personally.

    If you can't do that, I'd rather deal with a more serious mind virus.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    You talk a lot about instagram

    Because that is where Alefantis posted.

    There are no other pictures related to this child.

    There are more. E.g. wearing a "pizza slut" t-shirt.

    YOU are claiming the other photos are connected.

    Yes. Alefantis commented on most or is connected via his restaurant.

    Also notice that the simple explanation isn't good enough

    If you want to claim a slamdunk debunk then the simple explanation must be the only explanation, or the suspicious explanation is shown to be impossible.

    Your "debunk" falls far short.

    The only claim I made is that I have seen no proof of illegal activity.

    You claimed pizzagate is absolute garbage. That it was debunked.

    2 dudes on a street correr and a BMW parked nearby is not proof of illegal activity. But it is suspicious. You want the police to check it out.

    I'm worried about one who see that photo as normalization of child abuse.

    Dude, you're the one obsessed with this particular photo.

    "There is a gay person in my life that I love, and they live a meaningful, fulfilling life." Send your gay strawman away.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    Please remove the quotation marks. That's not how words work.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    There is a gay person in my life that I love, and they live a meaningful, fulfilling life. I love gays. Great fun.

    What I don't like seeing them being irrelevantly dragged into arguments in an attempt to distract and score cheap points.

    This has nothing to do with showing that the claims made by pizzagate are impossible.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child)

    Cool. There are gay people I love too. Wouldn't change a thing about them.

    Dude, you’re the one obsessed with this particular photo.

    Sure am. You see someone showed it to me in a document they linked. They called the dossier the best evidence of pizzagate. That dossier has this particular photo. It even said "We might as well start with this picture of a girl taped to a table, which is probably the most widely referenced one." Of course, that " girl taped to a table" was standing on the floor with her arms affixed to a table with masking tape, and not even a lot of tape.

    That photo sure stirred up a frenzy. My claim was that anytime anything that is purported to be concrete evidence is investigated, it sure looks like nothing upon inspection. The pizzagater always plays the Homonym Game. "I was talking about a different photo?" Well, I'm talking about this photo.

    So if you argue that frenzies show there must be something happening, I will point to THIS picture. Because it is THIS that picture that by itself caused a frenzy. Read the words around the picture. Then read my proposal of the only definition of pizzagate i can agree with

    Pizzagate: The believe that real world damage can be caused simply by never admitting any harmless explanations regardless of plausibility.

    So 4chan decides to use Pizzagate as a weapon to sick on this shop owner and his friends and family. It fits just fine.

    You act like I'm cherry-picking, because you know most people aren't going to check, and the kinds of people that do check don't fall for this shit.

    Well, that piece of "evidence" is clearly trash. Anyone trying to sell it to me thinks I'm stupid. Why would I bother?

    Do you have a dossier that does NOT include wastes of time?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    They called the dossier the best evidence of pizzagate.

    Did they? It's not a bad introduction but voat had much better documentation.

    That dossier has this particular photo.

    Again? Let's discuss this one instead.

    Well, I'm talking about this photo.

    The photo is not illegal, but it is suspicious, especially when combined with Alefantis' other posts.

    Because it is THIS that picture that by itself caused a frenzy.

    See. You have to add in and highlight "by itself".

    So 4chan decides ...

    4chan didn't make him post suggestive comments or host suspicious files on his website.

    Well, that piece of "evidence" is clearly trash.

    You have failed to make this argument clearly.

    Do you have a dossier that does NOT include wastes of time?

    So one item labeled a waste of time allows you to disregard the rest. This is a repeat of the "no basement=debunked" argument.

    Pizzagate debunkers are just as illogical as Pizzagate true believers.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    I'm not talking about another photo. You have a mountain of evidence. Please edit out any trash designed to waste time. That picture is a pretty clear litmus test. I'm not stupid enough to be scared of that photo. If you think I am, this will not go anywhere.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    I'm not talking about another photo.

    Then you aren't going to debunk them.

    Please edit out any trash designed to waste time.

    If you had been able to debunk pizzagate this step would not be necessary.

    That picture is a pretty clear litmus test.

    Sadly I think I agree.

    I'm not stupid enough to be scared of that photo.

    I'm not really interested in measuring how stupid you are.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    I’m not really interested in measuring how stupid you are.

    Then what are you even doing here? Honestly. You asked if my favorite podcast had a pizzagate episode.

    I said, i don't think so. I'll ask others. I don't like talking about pizzagate because every claim is dumb. I said:

    The only thing interesting about pizzagate is how strongly people can hold on to beliefs with zero backing

    In fact, I’d go as far as to say, the fact there is no evidence backing it up is precisely why this stuff is so dangerous. If some one is mentally unsteady enough to accept any reason to hate their enemies, they are probably pretty dangerous to be around already. Now use a massive media operation so that person need no other source of news. He (sorry to be sexist, but I’m going to stick with “he” for the easily influenced viewer’s pronoun) knows he’s right. He hears nothing but that he is right. However, out in the dangerous part of the world [to clarify, i mean reality i meant to put quotes], no one cares about this. It’s so fucking easy to dismiss this stuff. Why would anyone believe it?

    None of that has changed. The more I say, the more you shift and want me to look elsewhere. It's clear to me that anyone who could read that doc and not be embarrassed that they are trying to spook you with that picture, is not worth engaging with.

    You picked out me saying "no victims coming forward". You know there's still not any, right? No matter how many different things you tell me. You called it a "bad argument". I'm not here to argue. You brought this shit up. It's not an argument. It's a fact. You can keep claiming not to make an claims. But facts are facts. Calling them "arguments" makes them sound like they can be "bad". Nope. I said a fact, and you took personally.

    So you link some homophobic shit. i don't want to read that. There's some horrible allegations that if some unhinged individual who has a fuzzy notion of epistemology reads, things could get and have gotten ugly.

    Your lies are consequence free. Is there anyone (journalist, pundit,...) with a reputation to protect that says anything about this?

    If you had been able to debunk pizzagate this step would not be necessary.

    Can you show where I had expressed any desire to debunk this? This might be my first use of the word in this thread.

    I said it's not interesting. I haven't seen any claim attached to anything concrete. Why would I engage? I'm not a witness.

    The only document you have has claims that no one can be serious about. I'm asking you to remove those. You're just wasting my time.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child)

    You asked if my favorite podcast had a pizzagate episode.

    Yes. Thanks for that. Sincerely.

    I don't like talking about pizzagate because every claim is dumb.

    A lazy, blanket statement leading to this lengthy thread.

    The only thing interesting about pizzagate is how strongly people can hold on to beliefs with zero backing

    It's also interesting how claims that it was debunked dissolve when examined.

    the fact there is no evidence backing it up

    I linked to some evidence. It's hard to do so now that search engines have been scrubbed and voat has died.

    Why would anyone believe it?

    Because the claims are not impossible, or even unlikely.

    The more I say, the more you shift and want me to look elsewhere.

    At the beginning I gave you the NYT and a steemit link with additional evidence. Nothing has shifted.

    You link some homophobic shit. It's clear to me that anyone who could read that doc and not be embarrassed that they are trying to spook you with that picture, is not worth engaging with.

    I didn't write it. There are not a lot of other options that search engines index. Just view the pictures if the text offends you.

    Your lies are consequence free.

    All the linked evidence is factual. I've not drawn any conclusions. Not sure what I could have lied about.

    Is there anyone (journalist, pundit,...) with a reputation to protect that says anything about this?

    This was the closest

    Can you show where I had expressed any desire to debunk this?

    Whenever you state that every pizzagate claim is dumb.

    The only document you have has claims that no one can be serious about. I'm asking you to remove those.

    Ok. I'll remove everything from that document except for this

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    Is there anyone (journalist, pundit,...) with a reputation to protect that says anything about this?

    This was the closest

    No one will touch this with a 10-foot pole. People that the pizzagaters victimized have been hurt, and some of the worst offenders of the conspiracy theory were arrested. No one will put a stake on this.

    All the people that used to talk about this have disappeared. There once was a rush when people were talking about that document. Adding new threads. Making connections. This was going to be it. But nothing came.

    I believe you may be chasing a high that was at its peak when it looked like pieces were coming together.

    Everything fizzled. Now you're trying to get strangers worried about a list of files. It's not the same.

    The emperor has no clothes here. No one else will put their reputation on the line.

    I'm sure you have people in your life that you get along fine with. This is, provide no one brings this up. That has to feel isolating. Most people have moved on.

    I was being honest. I'm not interested in pizzagate. But I have heard from so many people describing what it was like to have once believed it. And what it felt like when they were able to reconnect with people who pushed them away.

    Obviously, I don't know you. You're fine to tell me I'm way off base. We're strangers here, but it's just food for irl-thought.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    People that the pizzagaters victimized have been hurt, and some of the worst offenders of the conspiracy theory were arrested.

    One crazy person has been jailed. No-one was hurt. All because the police failed to investigate.

    All the people that used to talk about this have disappeared.

    Because there is nothing new to talk about. Although if someone had done a thorough debunking then that would be new information of interest.

    I believe you may be chasing a high that was at its peak when it looked like pieces were coming together.

    This may be true for people searching the Internet and finding clues. Crowdsourced Sherlock Holmes. I only got interested when the crackdown happened, subreddits were closed and journalists silenced. Then claims of debunking popped up (usually without logical argument).

    Debunking is much more interesting, scientific and rigorous than the actual conspiracies. James Randi, moon landings, aliens, 9/11. You learn a lot from a good debunk (hence my interest in your favourite podcast)

    Now you're trying to get strangers worried about a list of files.

    No, I'm trying to establish if it has been debunked. That there is no possibility of truth in the claims.

    If you said pizzagate was unlikely, dubious or unconfirmed then I would agree and we wouldn't be having this exchange.

    The emperor has no clothes here.

    Neither do the debunkers following behind.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    Did you ever used to post at 4chan?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    No. Too difficult to follow conversations. My exposure has been 2nd hand by reddit or reformed text

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    i used to post on 4chan all the time. the hard to follow part was a feature. It let's you see only the good stuff in a way that's hard to explain, but I'll try.

    The fun of 4chan is that everyone is full of shit. In fact, there posts about how much shit everyone else is full of. It's fun.

    So how do you have fun on 4chan? It's easy. You lie. You're anonymous. It's consequence free.

    It's been said that people like "bad jokes" because jokes split the room into two groups: those that get it and those that don't. A "bad joke" has a very forced punchline so that everyone gets the joke. There is no split in the room. Everyone hates the joke together.

    A lie on 4chan splits the readership. Those that are ready to debunk anything. And those that "yes, and..."

    The "bad lies" were no fun. Easy debunk, no one elaborating. The other lies were the fun ones.

    The debunking group is the loudest, most numerous, and had tons of fun. There were infographics on how to tell if the user was pretending to be two different people ("samef--"). There were infographics on how to see photoshop artifacts. All kinds of good skeptical reasoning and debunking tools. The debunkers proved the liars lied.

    The debunkers would share huge greentext png files of reformated text laying out how full of shit that all the liars are.

    The other group had a different kind of fun. They found that if they see an obvious lie, they "yes, and...". That's an improv cliche that means you fully accept the OP's premise and develop it fuller yourself.

    Wrestling fans would call it "kayfabe". Horror fiction on reddit has "nosleep" rules. It's in general, a willful supension of disbelief. These are "metarules" in a sense. They are rules saying it's against the rules to mention the rules.

    Of course the yes-anders got debunked to hell and back. There are all kinds of greentext proving it.

    But, the yes-anders shared greentext too. They had huge pngs full of undebunked truth. It was easy to do. It's all lies, and they are editing this huge png files. They just leave off an debunking.

    Is it really that easy to just cut out the debunking? Wouldn't it just be easy to check?

    HELL NO. That's the fucking point of 4chan.

    Too difficult to follow conversations. My exposure has been 2nd hand by reddit or reformed text

    It is IMPOSSIBLE to follow conversations. Everyone is only responding to what they came to see. There's no "I'll get back to that". You got to spew your shit while the shit is flying. Or you miss the fun.

    This is where the debunkers always lose. There is just too much shit to debunk.

    People reform the text into the png files I was mentioning. Put out a mountain of stuff. IGNORE ALL CONTRAPOINTS. And there are some people that believe them. When I said

    I’m sure 99% of posts about pizzagate are LARPing really. (I think the same of Flat Earth. At least, way back when.)

    I mean, they are the yes-anders. The people pretending to believe it because its fun to watch people try to debunk things when they never admit other, plausible explanations. I would have to say that the "99%" figure is an uneducated statement, so your guess is as good as mine.

    But there are those that see this spread without any debunking because the debunking is lost. And anyone that tried was driven crazy by people pretending not to understand. So it's now an echo chamber of those that fell for it.

    4chan was fun. I'm glad I quit.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    The only time 4chan /pol caught my attention was when FBIanon posted about the Clinton foundation. I thought it was a fun LARP, then Bill Clinton has a clandestine airplane meeting with Loretta Lynch.

    But given that nothing has happened to the Clinton foundation I would accept that FBIanon has been debunked.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent