▲ 48 ▼ Ford Says It's Committed to V-8 Mustangs Regardless of What Others Do (www.roadandtrack.com) submitted 2 years ago by TheArstaInventor@lemmy.world to c/cars@lemmy.world 29 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children) There's nothing more American than a V8 that churns out a shockingly small amount of power and turns petrol into literally nothing. 7.2L V8 producing 200HP 💪🦅🇱🇷 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] KpntAutismus@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago i mean... they do pay around 4 bucks per gallon. if you do a bit of math, we europeans pay double. and then it has like 600 nm of torque, but it'll do burnouts at 2000rpm. and they wonder why even some americans don't want their cars. permalink fedilink source parent [–] USSEthernet@startrek.website 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) In...the...60s-70s maybe. Today's V8 mustangs and camaros pump out 400-700HP depending on model. Yea fuel mileage still sucks but it's improved from those old models. Definitely not something you should get if you want fuel efficiency. I can't tell if you're just being facetious. permalink fedilink source parent [+] umbrella@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] guylacaptivite@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago* Ford haven't used pushrod mustang engines since the 4.6 from the early 90's. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] KpntAutismus@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago i mean... they do pay around 4 bucks per gallon. if you do a bit of math, we europeans pay double. and then it has like 600 nm of torque, but it'll do burnouts at 2000rpm. and they wonder why even some americans don't want their cars. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] USSEthernet@startrek.website 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) In...the...60s-70s maybe. Today's V8 mustangs and camaros pump out 400-700HP depending on model. Yea fuel mileage still sucks but it's improved from those old models. Definitely not something you should get if you want fuel efficiency. I can't tell if you're just being facetious. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] umbrella@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] guylacaptivite@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago* Ford haven't used pushrod mustang engines since the 4.6 from the early 90's. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] guylacaptivite@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago* Ford haven't used pushrod mustang engines since the 4.6 from the early 90's. permalink fedilink source parent