▲ 399 ▼ Tesla Cybertruck Owners Who Drove 10,000 Miles Say Range Is 164 To 206 Miles (insideevs.com) submitted 2 years ago by L4s@lemmy.world [M, B] to c/technology@lemmy.world 185 comments fedilink hide all child comments Tesla Cybertruck Owners Who Drove 10,000 Miles Say Range Is 164 To 206 Miles::Also, the charging speeds are below par, but on the flip side, the sound system is awesome and the car is “a dream to drive.”
[–] Jackthelad@lemmy.world 79 points 2 years ago (10 children) Why does it look like a car from a PS1 game? permalink fedilink source hideshow 20 child comments replies: [–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 29 points 2 years ago StarFox on the SNES has more polygons than that. permalink fedilink source parent [+] the_post_of_tom_joad@sh.itjust.works 21 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 years ago (2 children) Because we live in the version of reality where the worst idea is the best idea and we don’t actually care about anyone’s wellbeing and safety. The car is shaped the way it is to inflict the most fatalities on pedestrians. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ThePantser@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago* And the us traffic safety board is refusing to test it's crash rating because they don't have to. It's so fishy that this is a new stupid design and they don't want to test it. Either Elon paid them off or they refuse to give or sell one to test. I have a feeling it would get a 2 out of 5 stars. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 years ago I think the artist behind Mad Max might have some ideas worth exploring. When in doubt, add more spikes. permalink fedilink source parent [–] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (1 child) Because Musk wanted to make a vehicle out of stainless steel and straight panels are the easiest/cheapest to form. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] tyler@programming.dev 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) Straight panels are much harder to make as every bend and minor imperfection show up. https://www.cnbc.com/2023/12/13/why-the-cybertruck-is-so-hard-to-manufacture.html Why do you think cars are never made with straight panels? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (2 children) Straight stainless is easier. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] tyler@programming.dev 3 points 2 years ago I mean, if you read the article that’s just not accurate. And musk has said as much many times over. permalink fedilink source parent [–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 years ago If it was really that thick plate it would be, but making any modern vehicle (that’s not meant for military use in hostile territory) out of thick plate is fucking stupid. And keeping thin stainless flat is really tricky, it wants to have at least a bit of curve to stay rigid. It asoc doesn’t like consistent forming, which is why nobody since Delorean has bothered. Both for weight, and economy, but also for accident safety—good luck of you’re not also in an armored car, and occupant safety, since the crumble zones are greatly reduced and going to transfer way more energy into your soft tissues and internal organs. But you can throw a rubber baseball at it just fine at least. permalink fedilink source parent [–] tyrefyre@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 years ago Hey Elon stole my plans where I drew this exact thing the very first time I ever tried to draw a car. I think I was 4. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Steve@communick.news 7 points 2 years ago (2 children) Are you genuinely asking? Because I thought all these jokes were made when it was first unveiled 5 years ago? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] otp@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) And it still looks stupid today permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [+] nonailsleft@lemm.ee -21 points 2 years ago (2 children) Lemmy is 99% karmabots at this point permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] frunch@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) Is karma tracked on Lemmy? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] otter@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago Not after 0.19 permalink fedilink source parent [–] sir_reginald@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago karma is useless in Lemmy, so it would be just idiotic to do such a thing permalink fedilink source parent [–] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago I mostly see the N64 Rush 2049 car called Venom I think. It was mostly a Lamborghini Diablo. Maybe it just stood out in the sea of rounded futuristic cars. Side note, I think the one called Euro LX was really just the BMW 6-series concept from the Bengal era. Funny how it landed in a mix of futurism that included a rocket car permalink fedilink source parent [–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children) And why, after we ridiculed this thing 10 years ago for being a low-poly abomination and then it disappeared from view for two decades, did they suddenly decide to release the thing with apparently zero changes in 2023? This is a terrible, ridiculed, 10 year old atrocity. How is it being taken seriously? I feel like I’m on crazy pills. e: number typos permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] spongebue@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) I don't disagree, except it was 4 years ago that they unveiled the abomination. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) It was definitely previewed at least ten years ago. In my old job as UX designer, we were laughing at it around the office, and I haven’t worked there for 12 years. It may have been a limited preview in design circles, not a public announcement, but the design hasn’t changed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] spongebue@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Hmmm, design and everything? That event with the broken windows was a lot last than that, and that's when it really turned it into a meme permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago At that point, it was a primarily visual design with some technical specs (obviously aspirational, there was no prototype yet). permalink fedilink source parent [+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] Hackerman_uwu@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago The Lara Crofts boobs comparison is still the most accurate IMO. permalink fedilink source parent [+] indigomirage@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 29 points 2 years ago StarFox on the SNES has more polygons than that. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] the_post_of_tom_joad@sh.itjust.works 21 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 years ago (2 children) Because we live in the version of reality where the worst idea is the best idea and we don’t actually care about anyone’s wellbeing and safety. The car is shaped the way it is to inflict the most fatalities on pedestrians. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ThePantser@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago* And the us traffic safety board is refusing to test it's crash rating because they don't have to. It's so fishy that this is a new stupid design and they don't want to test it. Either Elon paid them off or they refuse to give or sell one to test. I have a feeling it would get a 2 out of 5 stars. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 years ago I think the artist behind Mad Max might have some ideas worth exploring. When in doubt, add more spikes. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ThePantser@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago* And the us traffic safety board is refusing to test it's crash rating because they don't have to. It's so fishy that this is a new stupid design and they don't want to test it. Either Elon paid them off or they refuse to give or sell one to test. I have a feeling it would get a 2 out of 5 stars. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 years ago I think the artist behind Mad Max might have some ideas worth exploring. When in doubt, add more spikes. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (1 child) Because Musk wanted to make a vehicle out of stainless steel and straight panels are the easiest/cheapest to form. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] tyler@programming.dev 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) Straight panels are much harder to make as every bend and minor imperfection show up. https://www.cnbc.com/2023/12/13/why-the-cybertruck-is-so-hard-to-manufacture.html Why do you think cars are never made with straight panels? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (2 children) Straight stainless is easier. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] tyler@programming.dev 3 points 2 years ago I mean, if you read the article that’s just not accurate. And musk has said as much many times over. permalink fedilink source parent [–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 years ago If it was really that thick plate it would be, but making any modern vehicle (that’s not meant for military use in hostile territory) out of thick plate is fucking stupid. And keeping thin stainless flat is really tricky, it wants to have at least a bit of curve to stay rigid. It asoc doesn’t like consistent forming, which is why nobody since Delorean has bothered. Both for weight, and economy, but also for accident safety—good luck of you’re not also in an armored car, and occupant safety, since the crumble zones are greatly reduced and going to transfer way more energy into your soft tissues and internal organs. But you can throw a rubber baseball at it just fine at least. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] tyler@programming.dev 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) Straight panels are much harder to make as every bend and minor imperfection show up. https://www.cnbc.com/2023/12/13/why-the-cybertruck-is-so-hard-to-manufacture.html Why do you think cars are never made with straight panels? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (2 children) Straight stainless is easier. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] tyler@programming.dev 3 points 2 years ago I mean, if you read the article that’s just not accurate. And musk has said as much many times over. permalink fedilink source parent [–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 years ago If it was really that thick plate it would be, but making any modern vehicle (that’s not meant for military use in hostile territory) out of thick plate is fucking stupid. And keeping thin stainless flat is really tricky, it wants to have at least a bit of curve to stay rigid. It asoc doesn’t like consistent forming, which is why nobody since Delorean has bothered. Both for weight, and economy, but also for accident safety—good luck of you’re not also in an armored car, and occupant safety, since the crumble zones are greatly reduced and going to transfer way more energy into your soft tissues and internal organs. But you can throw a rubber baseball at it just fine at least. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (2 children) Straight stainless is easier. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] tyler@programming.dev 3 points 2 years ago I mean, if you read the article that’s just not accurate. And musk has said as much many times over. permalink fedilink source parent [–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 years ago If it was really that thick plate it would be, but making any modern vehicle (that’s not meant for military use in hostile territory) out of thick plate is fucking stupid. And keeping thin stainless flat is really tricky, it wants to have at least a bit of curve to stay rigid. It asoc doesn’t like consistent forming, which is why nobody since Delorean has bothered. Both for weight, and economy, but also for accident safety—good luck of you’re not also in an armored car, and occupant safety, since the crumble zones are greatly reduced and going to transfer way more energy into your soft tissues and internal organs. But you can throw a rubber baseball at it just fine at least. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] tyler@programming.dev 3 points 2 years ago I mean, if you read the article that’s just not accurate. And musk has said as much many times over. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 years ago If it was really that thick plate it would be, but making any modern vehicle (that’s not meant for military use in hostile territory) out of thick plate is fucking stupid. And keeping thin stainless flat is really tricky, it wants to have at least a bit of curve to stay rigid. It asoc doesn’t like consistent forming, which is why nobody since Delorean has bothered. Both for weight, and economy, but also for accident safety—good luck of you’re not also in an armored car, and occupant safety, since the crumble zones are greatly reduced and going to transfer way more energy into your soft tissues and internal organs. But you can throw a rubber baseball at it just fine at least. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] tyrefyre@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 years ago Hey Elon stole my plans where I drew this exact thing the very first time I ever tried to draw a car. I think I was 4. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Steve@communick.news 7 points 2 years ago (2 children) Are you genuinely asking? Because I thought all these jokes were made when it was first unveiled 5 years ago? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] otp@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) And it still looks stupid today permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [+] nonailsleft@lemm.ee -21 points 2 years ago (2 children) Lemmy is 99% karmabots at this point permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] frunch@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) Is karma tracked on Lemmy? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] otter@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago Not after 0.19 permalink fedilink source parent [–] sir_reginald@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago karma is useless in Lemmy, so it would be just idiotic to do such a thing permalink fedilink source parent
[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) And it still looks stupid today permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] nonailsleft@lemm.ee -21 points 2 years ago (2 children) Lemmy is 99% karmabots at this point permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] frunch@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) Is karma tracked on Lemmy? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] otter@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago Not after 0.19 permalink fedilink source parent [–] sir_reginald@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago karma is useless in Lemmy, so it would be just idiotic to do such a thing permalink fedilink source parent
[–] frunch@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) Is karma tracked on Lemmy? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] otter@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago Not after 0.19 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sir_reginald@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago karma is useless in Lemmy, so it would be just idiotic to do such a thing permalink fedilink source parent
[–] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago I mostly see the N64 Rush 2049 car called Venom I think. It was mostly a Lamborghini Diablo. Maybe it just stood out in the sea of rounded futuristic cars. Side note, I think the one called Euro LX was really just the BMW 6-series concept from the Bengal era. Funny how it landed in a mix of futurism that included a rocket car permalink fedilink source parent
[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children) And why, after we ridiculed this thing 10 years ago for being a low-poly abomination and then it disappeared from view for two decades, did they suddenly decide to release the thing with apparently zero changes in 2023? This is a terrible, ridiculed, 10 year old atrocity. How is it being taken seriously? I feel like I’m on crazy pills. e: number typos permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] spongebue@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) I don't disagree, except it was 4 years ago that they unveiled the abomination. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) It was definitely previewed at least ten years ago. In my old job as UX designer, we were laughing at it around the office, and I haven’t worked there for 12 years. It may have been a limited preview in design circles, not a public announcement, but the design hasn’t changed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] spongebue@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Hmmm, design and everything? That event with the broken windows was a lot last than that, and that's when it really turned it into a meme permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago At that point, it was a primarily visual design with some technical specs (obviously aspirational, there was no prototype yet). permalink fedilink source parent [+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] spongebue@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) I don't disagree, except it was 4 years ago that they unveiled the abomination. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) It was definitely previewed at least ten years ago. In my old job as UX designer, we were laughing at it around the office, and I haven’t worked there for 12 years. It may have been a limited preview in design circles, not a public announcement, but the design hasn’t changed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] spongebue@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Hmmm, design and everything? That event with the broken windows was a lot last than that, and that's when it really turned it into a meme permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago At that point, it was a primarily visual design with some technical specs (obviously aspirational, there was no prototype yet). permalink fedilink source parent
[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) It was definitely previewed at least ten years ago. In my old job as UX designer, we were laughing at it around the office, and I haven’t worked there for 12 years. It may have been a limited preview in design circles, not a public announcement, but the design hasn’t changed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] spongebue@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Hmmm, design and everything? That event with the broken windows was a lot last than that, and that's when it really turned it into a meme permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago At that point, it was a primarily visual design with some technical specs (obviously aspirational, there was no prototype yet). permalink fedilink source parent
[–] spongebue@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Hmmm, design and everything? That event with the broken windows was a lot last than that, and that's when it really turned it into a meme permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago At that point, it was a primarily visual design with some technical specs (obviously aspirational, there was no prototype yet). permalink fedilink source parent
[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago At that point, it was a primarily visual design with some technical specs (obviously aspirational, there was no prototype yet). permalink fedilink source parent
[+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Hackerman_uwu@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago The Lara Crofts boobs comparison is still the most accurate IMO. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] indigomirage@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent