▲ 920 ▼ Alec Baldwin charged for shooting; (lemmy.world) submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by Godric@lemmy.world to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world 101 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 46 points 2 years ago (3 children) It's never as simple as you think. Analysis of the events and circumstances, and commentary by a lawyer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wXmAeMQCvZQ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] takeda@lemmy.world 81 points 2 years ago (2 children) He says that Baldwin is unlikely charged for firing the gun but more likely for being a producer who failed to ensure that the set is safe. The thing is that he right now is being charged for firing the gun not for falling as a producer, that's why it seems pretty weird like they are really trying to sack him for some reason. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] PopcornTin@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) When you fire a gun, and it hits someone, you can't be that surprised when you are charged with that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] frozen@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 18 points 2 years ago (1 child) You absolutely can if you have every reason to believe it's not firing a live round, like say, on a film set, where all weapons are supposed to be cleared with armorers/prop masters. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] PopcornTin@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago ... and the actors. At least, that has been reported as the usual way. permalink fedilink source parent [–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 48 points 2 years ago (1 child) I love me some Legal Eagle, but this video is 2 years old and at the beginning he says they don't have the full facts yet and everything is speculative since they don't know what happened. I'm wondering if there's anything more recent with more info about what actually happened. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] aksdb@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago Legal Eagle? Let's french this up a bit and call him L'Eagle. permalink fedilink source parent [–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks [B] 7 points 2 years ago Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://www.piped.video/watch?v=wXmAeMQCvZQ Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube. I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] takeda@lemmy.world 81 points 2 years ago (2 children) He says that Baldwin is unlikely charged for firing the gun but more likely for being a producer who failed to ensure that the set is safe. The thing is that he right now is being charged for firing the gun not for falling as a producer, that's why it seems pretty weird like they are really trying to sack him for some reason. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] PopcornTin@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) When you fire a gun, and it hits someone, you can't be that surprised when you are charged with that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] frozen@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 18 points 2 years ago (1 child) You absolutely can if you have every reason to believe it's not firing a live round, like say, on a film set, where all weapons are supposed to be cleared with armorers/prop masters. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] PopcornTin@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago ... and the actors. At least, that has been reported as the usual way. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] PopcornTin@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) When you fire a gun, and it hits someone, you can't be that surprised when you are charged with that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] frozen@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 18 points 2 years ago (1 child) You absolutely can if you have every reason to believe it's not firing a live round, like say, on a film set, where all weapons are supposed to be cleared with armorers/prop masters. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] PopcornTin@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago ... and the actors. At least, that has been reported as the usual way. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] frozen@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 18 points 2 years ago (1 child) You absolutely can if you have every reason to believe it's not firing a live round, like say, on a film set, where all weapons are supposed to be cleared with armorers/prop masters. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] PopcornTin@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago ... and the actors. At least, that has been reported as the usual way. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] PopcornTin@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago ... and the actors. At least, that has been reported as the usual way. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 48 points 2 years ago (1 child) I love me some Legal Eagle, but this video is 2 years old and at the beginning he says they don't have the full facts yet and everything is speculative since they don't know what happened. I'm wondering if there's anything more recent with more info about what actually happened. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] aksdb@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago Legal Eagle? Let's french this up a bit and call him L'Eagle. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] aksdb@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago Legal Eagle? Let's french this up a bit and call him L'Eagle. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks [B] 7 points 2 years ago Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://www.piped.video/watch?v=wXmAeMQCvZQ Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube. I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub. permalink fedilink source parent
