▲ 250 ▼ A New York Times copyright lawsuit could kill OpenAI (www.vox.com) submitted 2 years ago by L4s@lemmy.world [M, B] to c/technology@lemmy.world 90 comments fedilink hide all child comments A New York Times copyright lawsuit could kill OpenAI::A list of authors and entertainers are also suing the tech company for damages that could total in the billions.
[–] LWD@lemm.ee -3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children) deleted by creator permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Grimy@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (1 child) I never claimed to be a copyright lawyer and there is literally no other copyright discussion except the ones pertaining to AI. I touched on my ideals because you were implying I was pro big business. I always try to have a reasonable discussion with you but you always end up writing these kinds of comments while never adressing my actual arguments. Have a good day bro. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] LWD@lemm.ee -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) deleted by creator permalink fedilink source parent [–] Grimy@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) You edited your comment after I responded. This is what you originally posted: "That's a pretty good trick, trying to conflate regulation of OpenAI with other impossible ideals you claim to hold, and drawing a hard line between that and your own suggestion: to let OpenAI win. I feel sorry for your clients. (By the way, Grimy claims to be a copyright lawyer, but for some reason he only crawls out of the woodwork when OpenAI is discussed. Sam Altman himself seems like a less biased source for how AI should be treated.)" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] LWD@lemm.ee -2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) deleted by creator permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (1 child) I never claimed to be a copyright lawyer and there is literally no other copyright discussion except the ones pertaining to AI. I touched on my ideals because you were implying I was pro big business. I always try to have a reasonable discussion with you but you always end up writing these kinds of comments while never adressing my actual arguments. Have a good day bro. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] LWD@lemm.ee -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) deleted by creator permalink fedilink source parent
[–] LWD@lemm.ee -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) deleted by creator permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) You edited your comment after I responded. This is what you originally posted: "That's a pretty good trick, trying to conflate regulation of OpenAI with other impossible ideals you claim to hold, and drawing a hard line between that and your own suggestion: to let OpenAI win. I feel sorry for your clients. (By the way, Grimy claims to be a copyright lawyer, but for some reason he only crawls out of the woodwork when OpenAI is discussed. Sam Altman himself seems like a less biased source for how AI should be treated.)" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] LWD@lemm.ee -2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) deleted by creator permalink fedilink source parent
[–] LWD@lemm.ee -2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) deleted by creator permalink fedilink source parent