▲ 1949 ▼ The Adblockalypse is coming (lemmy.world) submitted 3 years ago by Spudwart@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.ml 272 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] StewartGilligan@lemmy.world 40 points 3 years ago (5 children) As long as this doesn't impact Firefox, I don't care... permalink fedilink source hideshow 10 child comments replies: [+] scytale@lemm.ee 21 points 3 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] baked_tea@lemmy.world 7 points 3 years ago (2 children) Google is the source of most of the funding to Firefox. Can go 100 to 0 anytime basically permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] sexy_peach@feddit.de 15 points 3 years ago You're assuming that this will kill FF instantly instead of them finding new ways to fund themselves. Not saying the situation is good, but it's not that bad. permalink fedilink source parent [–] nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 years ago Don't they pay for firefox just so they don't get hit with antitrusts? permalink fedilink source parent [–] yukichigai@kbin.social 5 points 3 years ago I feel like that might trigger an anti-trust lawsuit somewhere. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Pyro@pawb.social 20 points 3 years ago The issue beyond them trying to change chromium to not have it but they are trying to make it so part of websites have the "security" built in as well permalink fedilink source parent [–] Mikina@programming.dev 14 points 3 years ago* (1 child) We know how it will impact Firefox. They will be deeply concerned with WEI and extremely opposing it, but will implement it anyway because they are forced to do it. It's going to go exactly like this. Again. With most competing browsers and the content industry embracing the W3C EME WEI specification, Mozilla has little choice but to implement EME WEI as well so our users can continue to access all content they want to enjoy. And that is almost a direct quote. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] StewartGilligan@lemmy.world 5 points 3 years ago (1 child) Someone will most likely create a fork to remove this or an option to disable it will probably be baked into about:config. I don't visit many sites that use DRM. When I do visit sites that require it, I'll usually shift to Ungoogled Chromium or Brave. Another one of my major fears with this change is whether Google will decide to make Chromium closed source and the implications it can have for other chromium based browsers. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Mikina@programming.dev 7 points 3 years ago (1 child) Someone will most likely create a fork to remove this or an option to disable it will probably be baked into about:config. But that's the issue - if WEI passes, EVERY webpage will be able to use DRM. So, just like you have to switch to Chromium for DRMed media content, you will now have to switch for every website that has decided to implement it. So, your bank (because google is pushing it as a security feature), Youtube, Gmail... Just like you are not able to play DRM media, you won't be able to visit DRMed websites without WEI API supported. It's not something you turn off. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 years ago I'd be fine ditching youtube and gmail instead of having to use their shitty services with ads that lead to fake software that compromise your computers. Also my bank could try this, I would quickly turn into their most annoying customer also it could get to the point that unless you run a specific OS these pages won't work and it would start being problematic legally for them. But until then I will pray everyday that the EU will take a hammer to WEI and break it's legs. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Dirk@lemmy.ml 12 points 3 years ago It will impact Firefox. permalink fedilink source parent [+] HellAwaits@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] scytale@lemm.ee 21 points 3 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] baked_tea@lemmy.world 7 points 3 years ago (2 children) Google is the source of most of the funding to Firefox. Can go 100 to 0 anytime basically permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] sexy_peach@feddit.de 15 points 3 years ago You're assuming that this will kill FF instantly instead of them finding new ways to fund themselves. Not saying the situation is good, but it's not that bad. permalink fedilink source parent [–] nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 years ago Don't they pay for firefox just so they don't get hit with antitrusts? permalink fedilink source parent [–] yukichigai@kbin.social 5 points 3 years ago I feel like that might trigger an anti-trust lawsuit somewhere. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] baked_tea@lemmy.world 7 points 3 years ago (2 children) Google is the source of most of the funding to Firefox. Can go 100 to 0 anytime basically permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] sexy_peach@feddit.de 15 points 3 years ago You're assuming that this will kill FF instantly instead of them finding new ways to fund themselves. Not saying the situation is good, but it's not that bad. permalink fedilink source parent [–] nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 years ago Don't they pay for firefox just so they don't get hit with antitrusts? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sexy_peach@feddit.de 15 points 3 years ago You're assuming that this will kill FF instantly instead of them finding new ways to fund themselves. Not saying the situation is good, but it's not that bad. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 years ago Don't they pay for firefox just so they don't get hit with antitrusts? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] yukichigai@kbin.social 5 points 3 years ago I feel like that might trigger an anti-trust lawsuit somewhere. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Pyro@pawb.social 20 points 3 years ago The issue beyond them trying to change chromium to not have it but they are trying to make it so part of websites have the "security" built in as well permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Mikina@programming.dev 14 points 3 years ago* (1 child) We know how it will impact Firefox. They will be deeply concerned with WEI and extremely opposing it, but will implement it anyway because they are forced to do it. It's going to go exactly like this. Again. With most competing browsers and the content industry embracing the W3C EME WEI specification, Mozilla has little choice but to implement EME WEI as well so our users can continue to access all content they want to enjoy. And that is almost a direct quote. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] StewartGilligan@lemmy.world 5 points 3 years ago (1 child) Someone will most likely create a fork to remove this or an option to disable it will probably be baked into about:config. I don't visit many sites that use DRM. When I do visit sites that require it, I'll usually shift to Ungoogled Chromium or Brave. Another one of my major fears with this change is whether Google will decide to make Chromium closed source and the implications it can have for other chromium based browsers. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Mikina@programming.dev 7 points 3 years ago (1 child) Someone will most likely create a fork to remove this or an option to disable it will probably be baked into about:config. But that's the issue - if WEI passes, EVERY webpage will be able to use DRM. So, just like you have to switch to Chromium for DRMed media content, you will now have to switch for every website that has decided to implement it. So, your bank (because google is pushing it as a security feature), Youtube, Gmail... Just like you are not able to play DRM media, you won't be able to visit DRMed websites without WEI API supported. It's not something you turn off. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 years ago I'd be fine ditching youtube and gmail instead of having to use their shitty services with ads that lead to fake software that compromise your computers. Also my bank could try this, I would quickly turn into their most annoying customer also it could get to the point that unless you run a specific OS these pages won't work and it would start being problematic legally for them. But until then I will pray everyday that the EU will take a hammer to WEI and break it's legs. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] StewartGilligan@lemmy.world 5 points 3 years ago (1 child) Someone will most likely create a fork to remove this or an option to disable it will probably be baked into about:config. I don't visit many sites that use DRM. When I do visit sites that require it, I'll usually shift to Ungoogled Chromium or Brave. Another one of my major fears with this change is whether Google will decide to make Chromium closed source and the implications it can have for other chromium based browsers. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Mikina@programming.dev 7 points 3 years ago (1 child) Someone will most likely create a fork to remove this or an option to disable it will probably be baked into about:config. But that's the issue - if WEI passes, EVERY webpage will be able to use DRM. So, just like you have to switch to Chromium for DRMed media content, you will now have to switch for every website that has decided to implement it. So, your bank (because google is pushing it as a security feature), Youtube, Gmail... Just like you are not able to play DRM media, you won't be able to visit DRMed websites without WEI API supported. It's not something you turn off. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 years ago I'd be fine ditching youtube and gmail instead of having to use their shitty services with ads that lead to fake software that compromise your computers. Also my bank could try this, I would quickly turn into their most annoying customer also it could get to the point that unless you run a specific OS these pages won't work and it would start being problematic legally for them. But until then I will pray everyday that the EU will take a hammer to WEI and break it's legs. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Mikina@programming.dev 7 points 3 years ago (1 child) Someone will most likely create a fork to remove this or an option to disable it will probably be baked into about:config. But that's the issue - if WEI passes, EVERY webpage will be able to use DRM. So, just like you have to switch to Chromium for DRMed media content, you will now have to switch for every website that has decided to implement it. So, your bank (because google is pushing it as a security feature), Youtube, Gmail... Just like you are not able to play DRM media, you won't be able to visit DRMed websites without WEI API supported. It's not something you turn off. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 years ago I'd be fine ditching youtube and gmail instead of having to use their shitty services with ads that lead to fake software that compromise your computers. Also my bank could try this, I would quickly turn into their most annoying customer also it could get to the point that unless you run a specific OS these pages won't work and it would start being problematic legally for them. But until then I will pray everyday that the EU will take a hammer to WEI and break it's legs. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 years ago I'd be fine ditching youtube and gmail instead of having to use their shitty services with ads that lead to fake software that compromise your computers. Also my bank could try this, I would quickly turn into their most annoying customer also it could get to the point that unless you run a specific OS these pages won't work and it would start being problematic legally for them. But until then I will pray everyday that the EU will take a hammer to WEI and break it's legs. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] HellAwaits@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent